Don't Follow the Rules on Steemit, BREAK THEM!!!

in #break-rules8 years ago (edited)

break

Have you heard that there are some rules on Steemit that you should follow? You should follow them in order to get the maximum rewards for what you do on steemit. Wait, what?

Are these rules set so that you as a user will be rewarded more for what you do or they are set to help steemit platform get the best of you as a user? It probably depends a lot on what you can here for, if it was for the money, and then maybe following the rules can help in some way, so by all means do try them and see for yourself. If you did not come for the money, but because of the idea steemit represents, then by all means... DO NOT FOLLOW THE RULES, BREAK THEM!

"Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist." - Pablo Picasso

If you here to contribute with your knowledge and expertise and be a valuable part of the community, then these rules will not help you in any way, in fact they will only hinder you instead, so just break them!


4 Blog Posts per Day Means Higher Quality

You should post no more than 4 posts for a 24 hour period of time, otherwise you get penalized more and more for each additional post you make - less rewards for you.

This rule sounds nice, right, it is there to encourage people posting fewer and higher quality posts per day. Contributing better quality to the steemit platform and getting rewarded for doing so.

What happens in reality you generate good quality content and want to contribute with your knowledge to steemit. You start following this rule, post less and most of your Blog posts still earn from 0 to just a few cents (regardless of the content), so even if you get a penalty in the reward should you care - NO. What if by any chance one of your posts makes it to the Trending page, then you probably would NOT care if there is a penalty to the reward you get in the end either.

I have tried following this rule for a couple of days after finding out about it and instead of helping it is actually doing exactly the opposite thing. Here I am, waiting for a couple of hours just to post something I have already written, but since I already got 4 posts in the last 24 hours I should not risk posting it because of a potential penalty. F#CK that, I'm posting things as soon as I want and as much as I want, I’m done waiting. It is not about the rewards, I'm just not letting anyone limiting my creativity by telling me I should write less, and that the quality might be better because of that!


Vote for Posts Likely to Go Trending, But After 30 Minutes

You should not vote for newly published posts earlier than 30 minutes after they have been published in order to maximize your potential curation reward. If you do vote earlier you get a penalty and thus a lower potential curation reward the earlier you vote.

So now, instead of looking for good posts that deserve to get your vote because you like what you have read or you just want to encourage the author to continue with the good stuff or for whatever reason you decide you get to look at the watch all the time. Open up posts and wait for the right time to vote and if by any chance a whale votes before you, you still vote (pointless) or instead don't vote as now you consider it pointless.

In any case even with the right timing of your vote if you are a new user (oh, you are here for the rewards) you still manage to get from 0 to 0.001 STEEM POWER as a curation reward if you are lucky. You did your best to play by the rules, choose the best time, select the right post that will surely get trending and still you get nothing, because well, your voting power is just too small to make a difference.

In fact you got it all wrong, your voting power may not be much and your vote may not be worth much, but what you do with it actually matters. Don't go for the 30 minutes, don't go for the right time to vote before the 30 minutes calculating possible penalty, don't go for the articles that are most likely to be trending, don't go for all that S#IT!

Look for the posts that you are interested in, that you like and that you think deserve your vote, regardless how small your voting power and what fraction of a cent it accounts for. Go for the content that deserves it and in the end doing the right thing and not following the rules you might actually also get a reward that could be higher than 0.001 SP. Even if you don't, you will at least know you did the right thing and that your vote meant something for somebody that deserves it instead of counting towards nothing for the author of a trending post and not bringing you anything as a reward either - moral or other.


Don't Go Using Your Voting Power Too Much

You should not vote for too many posts each day, so that your voting power will not be diluted too much and you will have a higher chance of getting curation rewards.

That is true if you have a lot of voting power already, but if you are a new user that just started your vote's worth is so small that it probably does not matter much if you dilute it even further by making 10, 20, 50 or a 100 votes each day. Your vote is way below the minimum threshold of $0.01 that really makes some difference and probably way to low even if you vote for just 1 post per day to even get 0.001 SP curation reward (the minimum reward you can get).

So vote as much as you want for who you want, vote for posts you like, for comments when you are in a discussion with somebody. It is the vote that you give to people that deserve to get it that matters and not the value it holds! If it is at least $0.01 then the value may also count, but for that you should have a few hundreds of Steem Power. Since you probably don't have that much yet you need to make sure that your vote counts and that you are not saving it hoping that it will bring you rewards, because it will most likely not at this point.

Go out there on steemit and vote without holding your votes, just give a vote when you feel that you need to give it to a post, regardless if it will go trending or not... what matters is that the vote you give will matter to the person that receives it, the vote is more important that the value it receives. Don't go deciding it is not worth voting for something that deserves it just because your vote has no big value to add to the reward of a post.

In the end your Voting Power regenerates over time, so go spend it all if you wish, just don't waste it by voting on absolutely every post you see... this will be indeed a pointless thing to do.


DO NOT FOLLOW THE RULES, BREAK THEM!

In the end you might not get any rewards at all, but you will at least not regret it and will feel much better for actually doing the right thing… that is if you are not in only for the money.

If you have any questions or want to add something, then please feel free to do so in the comments below...


Did you like what you have just read? Check my other posts on steemit @cryptos

Sort:  

Reminds me of my #minnowcodeofconduct post:
Vote for what you like
Comment when you have something to say
Post when you have value to share

The rest of the 'rules' are just whale games.

In other words, what everyone should be doing anyway.

I felt this stifling feeling myself, i even made a post about it. I felt this place was a little boxed in and really geared toward a certain group of people.

I felt perhaps I'd post my artwork here. But now i feel like "you can't post certain things here". Not sex stuff mind you, but the divine feminine form. Then there's the combination of the two, divine masculine and feminine that would be considered a problem. But i don't know, there's no FAQ or anything against posting such content so i don't know.

It's like a whole slew of people just winging it. I don't know, maybe I'll just post whatever and see what happens. Not like I've got anything to lose anyway, right?

I think you're free to post whetever you darn well please. People will either like it or not like it (or not see it). But that's on them.

Why do you feel stifled?
Just ignore the economic idiocy about maximization.
Use it like you'd use facebook.
If steemit can't maintain the social aspect of facebook, fuck it.
Use minds.com, or some other social network site.

Or, horror of horrors... FACEBOOK. xD

Critical thinking, i love it. Look at things from a different perspective, question them, test them, and then make your decisions based on this.

I became your fan now!

The rule about 4 posts a day is especially wrong when you have no significant amount of rewards yet to lose value on. You might have a dozen, maybe a hundred very good ideas that one of them might get upvoted. When you are starting out, it is better to just try and post the best possible quality, most interesting things you want to, and then when your posting starts to eat back your rewards, you can reduce your posting rate until you lock in your post reward. This is how I have been doing things, and now I finally have a post that is rewarding me enough to pay a month's rent, I am dialing back a little until I got that bill paid.

But then after it's locked in, I will keep posting until the next reward comes up. I am not just spamming, I have got some 22 years of thinking and study to bank on, and so far have found very little in the way of platforms where my ideas get a hearing let alone a reward. I am now at the age of 40, and I think having survived this far and dedicated a lot of my energy to learning from my experience, that these are the rewards coming from all the hard work and suffering I have been through and done over the years.

I like this breaking the rules thingy..sounds rebellious in a sense but its cool, upvoted and followed

Nice one, I've been thinking the same things lately =P But I am totally going to remember this quote for later, it's too good:

"Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist." - Pablo Picasso

You should post no more than 4 posts for a 24 hour period of time, otherwise you get penalized more and more for each additional post you make - less rewards for you.

This rule is hardwired in the sense, that your actual payout gets taxed.

The other 'rules' are interpretations of the algorithms and you can and should break them if you see fit - I agree

I'm refering to "rules" in a broader term :)

this is common sense advice. thank you @cryptos!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.14
JST 0.029
BTC 59165.12
ETH 2617.93
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.43