What We Know

I decided to rather wait a few days in the hope that we would learn more before making any assumptions of what happened.

The truth is that no one actually knows who is responsible, the rebels are saying that it is the Assad government, and they are pointing fingers at the ISIS rebels. So let's look at some things we do know.

Firstly Trump publicly states that he wants to get US troops out of Syria, which came just after the news that Syria and Iraq have declared victory over the Islamic State militant group, or ISIS as they are known. The rebels had also agreed to leave the area within 48 in return for prisoners. Then literally not even a week later, the Assad government is accused of a chemical weapons attack on civilians in Douma. This is exactly what happened last year under the exact same circumstances. Every time Asaad is winning the war against ISIS, he then decides to use chemical weapons which turns the entire world against him and gets him bombed to shit. Seriously, how does this make any sense, and do they really expect us to believe such bullshit? Why is the media not asking any questions regarding this, and why are they vilifying anyone who does?

---

"No one doubts that poison gas was used in Syria. But there is every reason to believe it was used, not by the Syrian Army, but by opposition forces to provoke intervention by their powerful foreign patrons, who would be siding with the fundamentalists." - Vladimir Putin

---

So there is no possibility that this could be a tactic used by the rebels maybe, no one is even going to explore this possibility? The unverifiable evidence was from that of the White Helmets, who are actually part of the ISIS rebels, so completely trustworthy. I am in no way saying this attack didn't happen, I am just asking questions. The fact the ISIS had used chemical weapons more than 52 times in Syria and Iraq before this, which seems to have no barring on the narrative. A terrorists chemical lab was discovered just a few weeks before this in the same area, but the mainstream media was completely uninterested. Then there is all the evidence found online of rebels staging chemical attacks, go look it up. The US secretary of defense admitted just a month ago, that there was no evidence that Asaad used chemical weapons last year.

---

"As international support for Obama's decision to attack Syria has collapsed, along with the credibility of government claims, the administration has fallen back on a standard pretext for war crimes when all else fails: the credibility of the threats of the self-designated policeman of the world." - Noam Chomsky

---

Thanks for popping in, hope you liked the post. Please leave me your thoughts and or opinions in the comments below, have a beautiful day.

• For the best posts on food and all things beautiful follow my @princessmewmew

• For those who love the the open road and the road less traveled follow @velimir
• The reason I joined this platform was thanks to one guy, the infamous @jeffberwick
• One of the first blogs I ever read when I joined steemit, great content @gavvet
• If you love a good laugh and all things Star Wars follow @thedarksideshow

Proudly powered by ADSactly - click this image above to join our discord server - Make sure to visit our ADSactly Society Steemit blog

Vote @adsactly-witness for your witnesses here.

✯ ✯ ✯

✯ Follow me for more fun ✯