In support of a real, scientific, investigative journalist...
Ill leave this you you tube segment here, for you to watch.
rich planet.net (richard D.Hall), is what journalism should be about.
Scientific.
Methodical,
Logical.
Open minded.
(he is an ex electronic engineer, himself)
I started watching his channel a few years ago, and if you want to see HOW things should be done, just go here.
( Madeline Mcann, various 9/11 investigations - 7/7 bombings - mass shooting investigations, ufo/nasa investigations)
I don't agree with all his conclusions on many things - but that is not the point.
The point is highlighting how investigatory journalism has ceased as a profession, and how we need to have more Richard d. halls -everywhere, doing this kind of work!
A pleasure to watch such professionalism.
I believe bad men/women/others in charge cause all havoc and evil. I first heard about all these 911 lies in 2005 from a video long gone and it was a hard weekend since I still worked for the navy. Now, I don't care. I hope they all go down in all this pedogate stuff and we can be without them.
But I'm not here for that!
I'm reviewing blogs today and you are up! You have great content and you are highly consistent. If you post 80% of these posts into challenges or contests, your rewards will increase. You have work that can easily go into many challenges. It's all about finding contests you like.
For example, kalamandra hosts daily color challenges for photographers. I use to do a lot of them, but now I only do purple and orange mostly - just to keep me focused. Those two are on my list of possible posts for those days. You will notice I almost never post unless it's into some kind of group thing so that at least those people are there and interested.
Miss k was also kind enough to recently collect all the contests into 2 posts so you can find them. Here is the second which leads to the first.
https://steemit.com/steemitchallenges/@kalemandra/daily-and-weekly-contests-and-challenges-part-two-day-by-day
Merry Christmas
Why do I feel like my schoolteacher is looking over my shoulder? lolol
Where do I find these said challenges ? (I'm being lazy I know)
Is there a forum or something?
Cheers for the compliments!
happy boxing day!
I am a university professor, and have a bunch of other teaching jobs in the past. My job here is to get the people I'm working with to make more money so I can too. It's social media networking and I do it all day long. It works way better here than elsewhere. Happy boxing day to you too. Still no money here and I need to go to immigration tomorrow. Such a fun trip!
don't ya love visa runs? lol (or just immigration?)
oops- you have alink and every thing! lol
Thanks will download that on to my USB to watch properly later watched 10 minutes before I realized it's in 3 parts & an hour & a half long. That's part 3 that you posted. Looks good. What's your opinion on 9/11 ?
One of the best guys, reporting analytically- the website has 100's of hours of very interesting thing on it..
how it happened you mean?
I'm more ansd more convinced on a new energy technique (dr. judy woods presentation - 3 hours of analytics from a dr of engineering )
The planes? - seems more and more like a missile of some kind...maybe holographic cloak or something...
The physics just don't add up for planes.
Start with the physics and work backwards, seems a good way to go..
As Mr. S. holmes said, 'eliminate all the possibilities, and whatever is left, no matter how improbable...
The third tower(wtc 7,I think, off the top of my head) was a controlled demolition, without a shadow of doubt - which would have taken weeks to set up (in the building.)
(definitely something to do withthe (3?) trillions of dollars missing in the cia - and funnily enough the records were kept..........wtc7!
Have a read of methodical Deception by Rebekah Roth I think she may have nailed it.
ok, cheers mate.
Just listened to an hour of her- I don't see what she brings new to the table, tbh
You have seen the subject matter before I guess. When I saw her it was all new to me so it was my first insight into that particular theory. Did the one you saw mention Kelloggs & isotopes?