RE: Who is @baah? Who cares? ...... information warfare - up close and personal..
Yet the shares and the vests DO belong to you. Much like fishing on the ocean is NOT meritocracy, it's both skill And luck, so saying that "it's not free market" is a non sequitur, fishing and selling fish work in tandem, but fishing is not selling fish and it doesn't follow that "fishing is not free market" because you have to established exactly why or how that is significant.
And:
You still have to define WHAT it is, if it's not free market.
For the uptenth time:
You don't have an ethical dilemma, only an equitable dilemma, and you don't want to acknowledge that that is exactly how business with shareholders function. The only difference is that this is A Game of sorts, not a business, much like fishing is a game AND a business.
And since you refuse to understand this, I will repeated it once more :
Nobody owns the blockchain.
Nobody owns the comment section.
Nobody owns the reward pool.
Steemit.com has a code of ethics.
Steem cannot have a code of ethics.
Steem is the ocean in the analogy of the fisherman.
Just because there is no code of ethics baked into fishing, does not preclude ethical behavior or encourage unethical behavior.
If you assert that without a code of ethics people will resort to aggression you must demonstrate that people, without a code of ethics, will be unethical, and you must do so in a majority anarchist society, as steem is, and point out exactly whose property rights or consent is violated or could be violated. You are abandoning your previous position though, of "ethical dilemma" by agreeing that no property can be violated, making Universal Ethics baked into the system by virtue of cryptography and clearly defined property, without any need for a code of ethics.
You must also reconcile the fact that you don't have a liberty bone in you, zilch, nada, despite virtue signaling to the contrary at seemingly any chance you can: because a liberty mind will not resort to authoritarian coding of ethics, especially when they recognize that humans can function without a code of ethics.
As for logic, or reasoning, you are lacking, that is putting it nicely.
You asserted umpteenth times: steem is not free market, because nobody owns the reward pool, but clearly free market is people taking goods to market, and without a way to PRICE A PRODUCT OR SERVICE you cannot expect anyone to buy.
Your logic is this: Shareholders getting profits from their stake/investments is not free market. So what? What made you think that ROI is the same as buying and selling? Another example would be, fishing is not free market. Or soccer is not free market. Clearly, you only have a non sequitur. It does not follow that fishing is about Trade. It does not follow that soccer is about trade, or owning stock is about trade. Yet, teams can buy players, much like people can buy stake, much like fishermen can sell their catch. Logician you are not.
Lastly, as for your slanderous nonsense about me, or your so called psychoanalysis, or your self diagnosed sanity, good luck selling that as true or correct or mildly applicable.
Posted using Partiko Android
Can you tell me about all those depositors at the banks and being secured creditors first...?
%20-%20Copy%20-%20Copy.jpg)
!dramatoken
Still trying to sidestep as if you don't need to specify which bank, which banking system. Iceland jailed their bankers. The living law firm has a National Bank. The banking system in the Arab world relies on fees not interest.
Your so called "source" on depositors being unsecured creditors equally didn't specify which depositors, for what bank/banking system. It reasoned that because you don't get back the exact same bills and coins that you deposited that you're an unsecured creditor. Ludicrous. Who cares about that? Yes fraud exists in banking, yes the Fed makes money based on promises to pay/ios from the very creditors (American People) that it turns into debtors then, called conversion, a type of fraud involving assets and banks. None of that means that there aren't Credit Unions and Private Banks that do not engage in fraud. Your nonsense for banks is the same as the nonsense for government when you blame government as if it's an actual entity that can shoulder one ounce of blame. Government is not the issue, people in government are the issue. Banks are not the issue, bankers are the issue. In both cases it's an issue only when they cheat, steal or defraud, and when they overstep their limitations and then violate their oaths.
Read you clown, read and be very critical of things that seem very cut and dry such as "you don't get back the exact same coins and bills you deposit, ergo you relinquish ownership of your money, ergo banks can simply steal it".
and so the therapy continues..
https://steemit.com/dtube/@lucylin/e50qctns
...
...
......
...
......
....
Morse code? Habitual insinuation, speaking extensively through omissions?
#fishing-isnt-meritocracy
#stakeholders-cant-freemarket
#code-ethics-because-muh-libertarian
#if-the-comment-section-is-not-my-proprety-whos-is-it
#cannot-fathom-that-nobody-owns-the-blockchain-and-its-impossible-to-aggress-on-it
#whines-about-his-posts-not-earning-as-much-as-other-people-and-denies-that-its-a-matter-of-equity-and-fairness-not-of-ethics
#incessantly-jumps-to-psychoanalasys-and-thinks-that-mockery-is-how-you-help-people-but-he-responds-to-mockery-by-shutting-down-or-running-away-and-has-never-responded-to-mockery-of-himself-as-helpful
#meme-the-clown
#we-agree-lmfao
Posted using Partiko Android
Until you can get a grasp of the banking relationship with its depositors (a12 year old can normally grasp it),
what can I say?
If you don't have the intelligence to understand it, it shows that you are swimming in waters where you don't belong.
If you lack the maturity to admit that you do not understand basic things in the world- but claim to understand concepts of ethics and morals, there is nothing to say.
(soooooo childish)
You are a either a petulant little child, in an adult body - or a disingenuous postmodernist, infected with mental illness, and not wanting to get healthier....
What a very sad, shit, outlook on life, you have.
I won't talk to a toddler about interest rates, when they can't even add 1+1 - there is no point.
You don't have much of a point, either, really, do you?
Do you need your pacifier, john/ andy/ whoever you really are?
Lol
"until you agree with my generalizing on what banks do I have nothing to say"
Called argument from silence/non responsive.
"if you don't agree, that means you're a little child"
Called ad hominem.
Whack ass clown can only clown.
Posted using Partiko Android
No - it's called being an adult and facing up to truths. (the postmodernist's biggest fear, I know..).
Dick.
You're not very happy, are you , john?
Wanna talk about it?
I'm a shoulder for you if you aren't gonna be a petulant child .....but if you wanna talk as grown ups, I'm here for you...
(no sexual impropriety please - I have a partner though, sorry mate, we have no future together..).
Lol so instead of explaining why or how you're correct, you're asserting that argument from silence and ad hominems are "adult". And now it must mean I'm not very happy. Lol
Why don't you explain like you would a 13 year old how all banks work exactly the same and why? Lol
Posted using Partiko Android
!dramatoken