RE: Blockchains should be designed like massively multiplayer games

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Blockchains should be designed like massively multiplayer games

sneak (64)in #blockchain • 8 years ago

It could be any of the following:

He's voting for himself with alts (@dan), such self-votes being generally frowned upon as against the spirit of the reward system on Steemit.
He's posting and voting after saying in his resignation post that he wouldn't any longer.
They disagree with the amount of reward the post will receive due to the upvotes of other people and wish to counteract those.

Could be any 1, 2, or all 3 of those reasons.

8 years ago in #blockchain by sneak (64)

Sort:

abit (70) 8 years ago

The story:

@dantheman posted and instantly self-upvoted
@abit downvoted to counter the whale-self-upvote effect
@kushed and @engagement and @thecyclist downvoted because they don't like the author (I guess)
@dan upvoted to counter the downvotes, but is over-weighted
@smooth downvoted to counter @dan
@adm downvoted to counter @dan
@fuzzyvest and @thejohalfiles upvoted because he like the post or the author (I guess)
@ned downvoted because he doesn't like the author or the post (I guess)
@val-a upvoted to counter @ned (I guess)
@goku1 downvoted for a reason which I don't know

$0.23

2 votes

[-]

fuzzyvest (62) 8 years ago

Yeh...that is about right for me. Everything i read of dans ive always loved. Just didnt get chance to tip him for a long time for his work :)

$0.00

[-]

tincho (63) 8 years ago

This comment is great! The best I've seen in steemit. I had the same doubt as stellabelle. You explained to me what it's happening in steemit in only 10 points. Bravo!! Bravo!!

$0.00

STEEM 0.26

TRX 0.30

JST 0.046

BTC 99453.18

ETH 3868.40

USDT 1.00

SBD 3.63

RE: Blockchains should be designed like massively multiplayer games

Coin Marketplace