You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: A Third Bill of Rights
Yeah but people back in those days used Logic and Reason and you didn't need to explain the obvious, even though 100 years later idiots like Spooner thought that the Federal Owed them something, least an explanation for their insinuation that there is no Rule of Law.
Yes, it would seem so obvious to the discerning eye. Too bad the 2 party system was created to usurp and take the agenda away from the people allowing for the deception of law and the downfall of the grand experiment in freedom of and for the masses.
The fault always lies with the Public who did nothing in the face of these usurpations, the last real Principal of the constitution for the united States was Andrew Jackson after that school was out, but before that the Public is what was against the wall by the actions of the Government, and ever since then the public has always been the only government, they have kept to themselves in true anarchist fashion and left it alone, even today, AS ever, people by overwhelming majority chose to not participate and there is no excuse for the fraud and deception that has happened besides the combination of apathy and anarchy, which with a little bit of consistency could have kept the truth ever evident, but that would have menat to actually Self Govern. It was never free of and for the masses because it was always simply about providing certain services in good faith, and the role of master and servant can never become to resemble the other or be confused!
The only rule of law we have is the people. Poly-tics are a pest that needs constant control, and at best they are faithful servants, but confusing the two is no excuse, because at that point the maxim of law caveat emptor