Maybe I'm confused. Test one is recent, I looked at test two. Looked at test two again and this time I noticed the date at the bottom. The first time I looked I thought test two was up to date. Test one looks to be accurate.
Is the curation portion deducted from those numbers?
The signatures of blockchain vote transactions can reveal who initiated the vote on behalf of the users. As a positive side effect: the same method also reveals autovotes via steemauto or steemdunk. The downside is: this approach is much more compute intensive and therefore slower than the bot list approach. Analyzing larger time ranges is costly.
Shrugs, doesn't matter to me one way or the other. I think the post is overly rewarded. Like any other post, how it got that way is not my concern. :)
Don't get all snowflakey on me you know the game.
edited my post before seeing your response.
Check out https://steemit.com/spam/@steem.organic/test
Coming soon...
That is really a cool tool!
That's a nice little gadget but it seems to be overlooking "smart market/steem" purchased votes on the most recent update.
I though we had most of those, Still digging more. If you have an easy way to detect them let me know.
Maybe I'm confused. Test one is recent, I looked at test two. Looked at test two again and this time I noticed the date at the bottom. The first time I looked I thought test two was up to date. Test one looks to be accurate.
Is the curation portion deducted from those numbers?
no curation is not removed, test 2 is just for editing purposes, the self-updaint post is currently the one from 19days ago.
Not an "easy" way but not impossible if you're looking at individual posts rather than large volumes.
https://busy.org/@crokkon/what-is-the-reward-pool-share-of-vote-sellers-bid-bots-and-autovotes-1535479520399
That's we were already using this to automate the tool.
hello no ingles solo spanish
Nice post! Really usable.
cointiply.com
I would believe that