You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Bitcoin big blocks farce is becoming a laugh.
Hiya @oaldamster , off-topic (somewhat): I think it's Satoshi Nakamoto (the other way around, Satoshi is his / hers / their first name! :P )
Hiya @oaldamster , off-topic (somewhat): I think it's Satoshi Nakamoto (the other way around, Satoshi is his / hers / their first name! :P )
First of all I know I am using the name of WE Nakamoto Satoshi with last name first. That is the way it is done in the far east, family name firstHad it in there why. ;-)
I understand that, but I've good reasons to suspect Satoshi isn't from the East at all ;-)
That is why they wrote it the wrong way round. And not many individuals speak of themselves as we. It is a cryptographic puzzle I think.
I see, you are indeed correct! The Bitcoin PDF mentions "We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network." in the abstract paragraph even!
It is being used all through the document. Interesting read overall.
Hahaha @oaldamster, you have 14 upvotes on your comment ^^^ above :P
I did read your whole article btw before I commented, but I was more or less commenting on your previous posts in which you did not explain using Nakamoto as a first name. Still I don't understand why you think we should use the Far East's way of naming the surname first...
Using the #eSteem app comes with certain advantages. ;-) ...
Writing it like Nakamoto Satoshi is the way I choose too. Others are free to do it in their own prefered way.
Partly the reason for me would be that the name is not connected to a person of Asian origin.
In my post I can do it like I did, to emphasize this. And then move on in a conversation about it.
Pointing out to the plural use in relation to the name, all througout the whitepaper.
To me that could be that the name itself is a crypthographic key. And the whitepaper contains more than meets the eye.
You are free to use the name in any way you want. :-)