Would The Father of Economics Invest in Bitcoin?steemCreated with Sketch.

in #bitcoin3 years ago (edited)

Considering the current turmoil in the crypto markets, I thought it would be a fun Idea to imagine ourselves in the shoes of the father of modern economics – Adam Smith – and decide if he would be willing to invest in Bitcoin.


Bitcoin.jpg

Before we start this little adventure, I must inform you that I am not the ghost of Adam Smith, nor am I a reincarnation of him, and I do not possess the means of communicating with his soul, so I would advise you to treat this post for what it is – speculative thinking that I hope has some rationale at its epicenter.
For Quotes.png

Bitcoin is a remarkable cryptographic achievement and the ability to create something that is not duplicable in the digital world has enormous value

Eric Schmidt

I believe R. G. Collingwood wrote in An Autobiography that a book is a set of answers that were given based on a set of questions that the author had at the time of writing the book. Since we start our Bitcoin investment analysis from The Wealth of Nations, we should consider that the book was written in a certain historical context, where it had the goal to deal with particular circumstances and conceptual particularities that were present at that time. So we cannot just extrapolate the teachings from The Wealth of Nations to the world of Bitcoin, but we can infer certain attitudes, principles, paradigms, and “decide” if Adam Smith would invest in Bitcoin if he was one of our contemporaries.

In Wealth of Nations Adam Smith states that money or currency is used as a medium of exchange in any transaction.


In Smith’s time we had commodity money. Commodity money means that the value of money is backed by a real world commodity. Hence it’s intrinsic value.

Going fast forward into 1933 we see the emergence of Fiat money. Fiat money is a currency without intrinsic value established as money by governments around the world. In Adam Smith’s time money’s worth was based around a real commodity. But now on what is money’s worth based would you ask. And although answers might be given that somewhat legitimizes the worth of current money, the truth is that money isn’t worth anything.

It is worth thinking about money as the bubble that never ends

Our system of money operates on a mutual set of beliefs; so long as enough of us believe in the future value of money the system will work. What happens when the belief system is shaken? – Millionaires. Millionaires Everywhere. But that’s like the dream, right? Well, look at what is happening to Venezuela and think again.


Venezuela is probably the exception rather than the rule. But it's not a singular case, as shown in this article.
Also consider that the total value of World's money is estimated to be around 83 trillion dollars. Recently USA’s debt alone surpassed 20 trillion dollars. And in a Market Watch article is stated that there is $1.2 quadrillion invested in derivatives alone.


But the funny part is the critics of Bitcoin saying that Bitcoin is not real, it’s a scam, it’s just some information in a computer, while at the same time around 90% of current money is digital. Ones and zeroes. “Printing” money these days is as simple as adding one more zero at the end of a number. And the current architecture of the financial system will never enable it to be as secure as the blockchain - on which Bitcoin is based. But that is another story.


So If I would come from a time where all I had known was commodity money, fiat money would be a bit unsettling. But seeing for what it actually is, as stated above, I would be scared of it. And since I personally know people who were making fire with money after the collapse of the Soviet Union, I can unfortunately say that I witnessed the bubble that never ends ending, and it wasn’t pretty.


Geralt @ pixabay.jpg

But where does all that leave Bitcoin?
Can Bitcoin really be the “new money” or is it all pure speculation?

Well, Bitcoin is capable of realizing all the functions that William Stanley Jevons analyzed in his book:

  • Medium of exchange;
  • Measure of value;
  • Standard of deferred payment;
  • Store of value,

and it possesses the necessary properties to fulfill those functions (except one):

  • Fungibility;
  • Durability;
  • Portability;
  • Cognizability.

Stability of value it’s Bitcoin’s big NO to why it can’t be a real currency. But in the context of our analysis, this weakness can be an advantage for investing in Bitcoin. That’s because its volatility is a sign that the market is still young. It’s a sign that Bitcoin might have a long way to go until it can be fully considered a true currency – this implies that there is still room for financial growth until bitcoin reaches maturity, and stability of value.

For Quotes.png

Bitcoin, and the ideas behind it, will be a disrupter to the traditional notions of currency

Edmund C. Moy

But Smith views money purely as a medium of exchange in any transaction, why would he want to invest in it, after all he states clearly that the sole purpose of holding money is to facilitate the circulation of goods and services. Thus the inhabitants of a country demand the specific quantity of money necessary to circulate the whole of their goods, and are unwilling to hold either more or less than this amount.

And the reason might be because he argues that a prudent man in every period of society will seek to always hold a quantity of some commodity such as he imagined few people would be likely to refuse in exchange for the produce of their industry.

Although many different commodities have functioned as a medium of exchange throughout history, in Smith’s eyes there are irresistible reasons as to why it is that the precious metals have proven to be the most favoured for exchange.

Preeminent amongst these reasons are the qualities of high durability possessed by the precious metals, and their capacity to be sub-divided with a relative degree of precision. And gold has proven itself throughout the ages to be… well, the golden standard.
So Smith would indubitably prefer gold as a currency instead of Fiat money. It is virtually indestructible. It is divisible, portable, sufficiently rare, fungible, non-essential for consumption, easily identifiable, a store of value.

At the same time think about how big of a hassle would it be to pay for your coffee with gold, to carry it most of the time with you, not to mention the inconvenience it would have using it at a large scale. So maybe Fiat has some advantages over gold as a form of currency, but Gold definitely is a good store of value & investment.

But what makes gold the best choice from all the other metals? There is no “objective” intrinsic value to it that enables us to say that gold is “better” than copper or palladium. The meaning that we instilled in it, based on the criterias that we determined to be proptitious for our economic dealings, makes gold the best choice from all possible contenders.

But now a new contender arises, and conceptually is so similar to gold, no wonder it was named digital gold.


Capture BTC.PNG

Yet a James Dimon knows that gold can be seen, it can be touched, it can be smelled, it can be licked. What about Bitcoin? Can you lick Bitcoin? Sorry, but for some of us this is a deal breaker. Bitcoin is no real contender. Bitcoin is a scam, it doesn’t have “any intrinsic value” like gold.

This logic is fallacious at its roots. If a song is stored digitally does that mean that it is a scam? It doesn’t really exist? It doesn’t have any real value? What about a picture? A movie? You get the idea. And at the same time we already discussed that the “intrinsic value” of gold isn’t objectively given to us by nature, but rather legitimized by the meanings we instill in it. So why would bitcoin be any different? Bitcoin derives part of its intrinsic value from our meaning of it, but ALSO from the man-hours it took to create it and it still takes to develop it, and from all the hardware and infrastructure upon with it is build and is functioning. Not to mention its characteristics that gives it an edge over traditional currency & over gold.

For lateral writing.png
So at this point you might be inclined to agree to some extent with me, and say at least that Bitcoin has some vague intrinsic value, but which is it then.

Is Bitcoin digital gold or digital cash?
I think it's both.

Bitcoin is Commodity Money 2.0
It’s what gold would have been as a currency. But it doesn’t have the disadvantages of gold. And it has all the advantages of fiat money while bringing so much more to the table.

And most important of all, Bitcoins embodies the ideal of The Invisible Hand that Smith believes should govern the free market. A currency that is not controlled by any government. A currency that is not centralized. A self-regulated currency. A currency that possesses the qualities of gold and the functionality of fiat money.





This all sounds like a dream. Too good to be true. And yet sometimes even dreams come true despite all the vicissitudes.

Will Bitcoin be one of those big dreams that seem unconceivable at first, unachievable after, and reality in the end?

That’s the big question!

I do believe though that Adam Smith would be intrigued by Bitcoin, and I think he would consider investing in it.

white-line-divider_5_orig.png
img.PNG
Follow me for future posts @kaizencrrr

Sort:  

Adam Smith, contrary to the conservative opinion promulgated by some adherents, was conscious of some of the issues of capitalism. In the US currently, those that are not in the financial sector are in a way oppressed financially unless they find a way to profit from investments that benefit from low interest rates. Bitcoin feels so underground because of the accesability of it for the ordinary guy.

yeah man the Low Interest rate Opression has created blowback where the average Joe is now getting interest rates for Saving Money that outperform any Bankers so we have all these "liuttle people" making returns that re WAY too much for them according to Jaime Dimon and other Bankers...They dont like the little guy making huge returns in short periods, because THAT ios only for the ELITE! Only the ELITE are a;lowed to make money this fast! Only the Elite are allowed to "create" their own money .....so maybe we should be fearful of the Banks trying to simply buy up al the biutcoin and bitcoin companies on Eartyh while theyre still affordable for the woprlfs trillionaires and steemit could just be bought up by Facebook r Googfle and buy out all the top Steempower users offering something like $5 or $10 per steem to powerdown and sell them all their steempower because with enough money someone could easily start taking over large sections of Steem blockchain bribing witness etc so I hope I am wrong and many whales and witnesses have integrity and im sure many do, and we only need a small group of whales with ethics and integrity to keep stem open and free, just like Bitcoin cannot be really dominated via Hostile corporate takeover since decentralized systems are always open to more people coming in and opening up their own BTC nodes and miners, anyone with the money and resources can build their own BTC mining farm or redirect mainframe cloud power to mining Bitcoin (albeit inefficiently but could allow someone to overnight dominate the Bitcoin network in terms of PetaHash) but still you then need to set up so many Bitcoin nodes to try and take over bitcoin, it seems improbbable and would not be worth it...or would it? well i dont see anyone being able to dominate bitcoin enot even the chinese!

we will see many many power struggle sin teh next ten years

Never sell Steem Power. Sell your kidneys before Steem Power :D

Great post, i also see next Step in combine real mony and digital currency. Like my idea of Coincard @svtechnik

@kaizncrrr and @svtechni I agree with you, this is really an excellent post, lots of investigation in history and great antropological comparison of what would Adam Smith decide in this scenario, that today its a reality. @gold84

@kaizncrrr thanks for your upvote. Now following you. @gold84

That's amazing! I would love to have a Coincard.
People like you are moving us at new heights of progress.
Man, am I lucky to witness all this greatness around me...

well done

You are too kind!
Thank you!

Thought provoking awesome read thanks @kaizencrrr

With pleasure!
Thanks for taking the time to go through it!

Fascinating article! I like your content. Upvoted and followed. Looking forward to more.

Thank you!
Appreciate your support!
Looking forward to provide more good content for you!

I really appreciate you buddy. Amazing post. Thanks a lot :) This post helped me to figure out the answers to the questions.

Thank you very much! That is my goal, to help YOU figure out the answers, not to give you answers.

This post helped me to write few Points in Exams :)

Haha, I hope you won't blame me if the mark is not the one you desired :)
But I'm glad I was of any help.

Hey, i enjoyed reading your post! Great insight, looking forward to read your future posts.
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2017/09/13/john-mcafee-claims-bitcoin-is-headed-to-500k.html

Thank you!
I don't know about $500K, it's seems so unreal at this point to me, but then again for so many people it was unreal to go to where it is today when it was worth 1$
But I do believe that there is greatness ahead.
Best of wishes!

I think that the encryption currency will eventually achieve a revolution from the existing currency.

I think your thinking, although might seem unthinkable to some, might be right.

I am not sure about btc....but i am sure about blockchain.

Although I like Bitcoin. I think Bitcoin might go to 0, I believe there is a minuscule probability, there are always uncertainties, so the advice invest what you are willing to loose is so on point.
But indeed Bitcoin did gave us the blockchain, which will be always its biggest achievement, even if it will be worth $100K or 0$

@kaizencrrr I enjoyed this post very much - would be interested to know what Ben Franklin would have thought about it as well! Would be interested in speaking with you regards to a feature on a future episode of Crypto Nights - a new series that I have started and posted on my blog.

Upvoted and followed!

Alex

Thank you, Alex!
I would be interested in knowing that too. But unfortunately I don't believe we'll ever know, just like we don't really know what Adam Smith would have thought about it. But it's a fun way to put our brain to work.
And I'm thrilled that you would consider me for a feature on one of your episodes. It would be an honour.
Looking forward to hear what you have in mind.

I bet he would! BIG GAINS. I'm sure even the Rothschild's have Bitcoin

Haha, and don't forget the Lambos.

Best explanation why CCurrency will be the future money all over the World. Thank you for this article! Resteemed for my readers.

Thank you!
And although you consider it one of the best, which is an honour, I think that this post is far from being exhaustive.
I feel that there is so much to be yet said about CCurency, and so much for me to read...
Take a look at this post for example if you have some time: Ideas Never Die.
It is so simple, it's like everything is already known, and yet it was so powerful for me thanks to its subtleties.
I believe that Steemians will give us yet better explanations in the future, which is so exciting...

Solid post and a good read! Thanks for sharing.

My pleasure!

BITCOIN - OBJECTIVE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS $100k yes, $0 No! (Video)

i view cryptocurrency market like PRANK COMEDY.

As long as it's fun for you, I don't see any reason why you shouldn't

This post recieved an upvote from minnowpond. If you would like to recieve upvotes from minnowpond on all your posts, simply FOLLOW @minnowpond

He would have developed his own Cryptocurrency

But what would it stand for?

But will Adam Smith #introduceyourself?

Edit: great write by the way, enjoyed it!

If he were alive, he would!
He also would have loved Steemit.
I mean... give me a reason why anyone would hate on it.

Edit: Thank you. That is my purpose.

Congratulations @kaizencrrr, this post is the second most rewarded post (based on pending payouts) in the last 12 hours written by a User account holder (accounts that hold between 0.1 and 1.0 Mega Vests). The total number of posts by User account holders during this period was 1371 and the total pending payments to posts in this category was $3020.41. To see the full list of highest paid posts across all accounts categories, click here.

If you do not wish to receive these messages in future, please reply stop to this comment.

Clever, well documented...
Cheers

Thank you!
Blessings to you, sir!

This post recieved an upvote from minnowpond. If you would like to recieve upvotes from minnowpond on all your posts, simply FOLLOW @minnowpond

Congratulations, your post received one of the top 10 most powerful upvotes in the last 12 hours. You received an upvote from @curie valued at 59.62 SBD, based on the pending payout at the time the data was extracted.

If you do not wish to receive these messages in future, reply with the word "stop".

Wow, I don't have any idea how or why, but I am grateful.
This inspires me to hoard as much steem power as I can to do one day the same for posts I enjoy.

well it is strong, it can by things, it has a influence on the global market, so I think he would consider

Really enjoyed reading your post. I believe that Bitcoin will be the gold standard in the future. My kids will transact in Crypto like we do in Fiat.

I hope for our own sake that you are right!
Nice picture you got in there, btw...

Thanks for you kind words. We did exchange some DNA lol

Wait, what do you mean you guys exchanged some DNA? :D

Yep met him and shook his hand...DNA was transferred from his hand to mine. Haven't washed my hands since the meeting ....lol only joking, but did meet the great man!

Thank you for this.

Woah I googled "adam smith bitcoin" this article came up first and then I saw my own comment in here!