Bitcoin the Phoenix Rises in a Wake of Dystopian Ashes — The Totalitarian Trojan Horses

in #bitcoinlast year (edited)


Bitcoin: The Digital Kill Switch — by AnonyMint aka Shelby H. Moore III (March 29, 2013)

Bitcointopia: How Libertarian Fantasy Turned into Crypto Dystopia

The Bitcoin Dystopia: Prelude

Has Bitcoin Laid The Foundation For A Dystopian Future?

Winds of Dystopia

Buried in the stimulus legislation is a tax break that removes the limits on amount of capital gains from real estate that will be tax-free from years 2018, 2019 and 2020.

This enables a massive fire-sale on real estate before the private sector interest rates skyrocket crushing real estate values into the abyss and putting Americans under water on their mortgages. The likelihood of a Great Depression is increasing.

Debunking Mark Roberts’ 9/11 Disinformation Tactics:

This is a continuation of my prior blog Disembarkment of the 9/11 Passengers.

Update March 25, 2020: WTC 7 Not Destroyed by Fire, Concludes Final University of Alaska Fairbanks Report:

“Our [four-year] study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse,” said Professor Leroy Hulsey, the study’s principal investigator. “The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”


AE911Truth and its allies among the 9/11 victims’ families will now use the findings in the report as part of a formal “request for correction” that the group plans to submit to NIST in the coming days. “The indisputable errors documented in our request for correction will give NIST no way out of correcting its deeply flawed report and reversing its conclusion that fires were the cause of the collapse,” said Gage.

Sorting the Nonsense & Prejudices from the Truth of Reality:

Hi Martin, I wanted to share something: this is not socialism coming. It is totalitarianism. What we have had so far is not Capitalism, it’s Cartelism. This is now a bloodless international coup taking place to centralize all power, to reduce the world’s masses to total utter dependency on the global elite technocrats, with a militarized police state protecting the elites from civil unrest. Small businesses are NEVER coming back. Mark my words.

At least this is the death of retail small business. We’ll have to move to virtual, online small businesses and vocations.

Hypocrisy & Conspiracy – Manufacturing a Crisis for Political Agendas?:

There is a political agenda here that seems to go beyond just trying to overthrow Trump and Merkel. This is also about rushing in ID2020 to infuse us all with chips, thanks to Bill Gates.

Bitcoin’s Future

Bitcoin didn’t bounce to ~$8k before declining anew. Which was an outcome I warned and charted in my prior blog COVID-19 Accelerates Totalitarianism; Hard Movable Assets Rising, :

It’s also possible for Bitcoin to be repelled by overhead resistance at the 100 WMA ~$7.2k:



Here is the way I suggest playing it. Take losses at $7.2k or $8k so no taxes due (might bounce to $8+k but I’m feeling nervous and anxious).

As I’m writing Bitcoin has dropped from $6.6k to $6.1k and appears to be headed down to at least ~$5860 at the last uptrend line of support for the short-term, bounce bullish triangle (on the linearly-scaled chart). Below that there’s support at ~$5k and $4.6k:

(click to embiggen)

I had an inkling that Bitcoin would decline before going higher when Bitcoin double-topped ~$7k and the DJIA and SPX stock market indices declined into the close of the week after rallying significantly in the early afternoon when the U.S. House of Representatives finally passed the stimulus legislation. A typical sell the news event and raise cash before an uncertain weekend. More confirmation that sentiment might turn negative was observed by listening to Trump admit that he might have to accept a longer period of economic shutdown than a reopening by Easter.

The Totalitarianism Virus

Tangentially even more disconcerting was Trump agreeing with a reporter’s question about whether there might be a necessity to impose some restrictions on travel into and out of specific areas such as counties, cities or States of the U.S.A. with very low or high levels of nCov-19 cases in order to prevent spread between these differential prevalence of the virus. Trump also said the Florida governor wasn’t happy about New Yorkers coming down for the Spring Break. And now some potential actions to that effect:

Trump Considering Enforceable Quarantine on New York, New Jersey and Connecticut

Rhode Island Governor Announces National Guard Will Go 'Door-to-Door' to Identify New Yorkers to Slow COVID-19 Spread

Coronavirus: Trump backs away from New York quarantine:

Mr Cuomo also said he would sue nearby Rhode Island if the authorities there continued targeting New Yorkers and threatening to punish them for failing to quarantine.

The fight above between Rhode Island, New York and other States could eventually lead to invoking Draconian laws that put the CDC (a private foundation!) in control of right-to-travel, c.f. Legislation to Force Testing or Bar you From the Public:

MEHPA stands for Model State Emergency Health Powers Act. It is a draft of model legislation to increase state powers to respond to bio-terrorism or other outbreaks of disease that the Centers for Disease Control and others want the states to pass into law. Although such legislation is needed, the current draft of the Model Act, unfortunately, is written in a way that doesn’t adequately protect citizens against the misuse of the tremendous powers that it would grant in an emergency.

Denmark rushed through a bill that allows them to enlist the police in forced testing, treatment, and punishment relating to the coronavirus. You can be punished for refusing to be tested, and you can be forcibly vaccinated. You can be refused access to supermarkets, shops, public transport, etc. unless you are tested.

More on that in the U.N. Enslavement of the U.S.A. section below…

I also noticed that Trump seemed much more upbeat and a better mood compared to a few days ago. Essentially I believe Trump is in a more compromising mood and feels less panicked urgency, because the stock market had a huge bounce this week. He knows his reelection hinges on “it’s the economy stupid.” I guess he feels with the stimulus help on the way that perhaps the worst of the stock market rout has completed. But there’s likely another leg down in the markets in early April.

Perhaps another reason for feeling upbeat is the media was publicizing a non-peer reviewed Oxford study that claimed only 1-in-1000 who become infected will end up hospitalized. Even Armstrong was naively boasting about this bogus paper to support his view that the economy can and must be reopened immediately. The Oxford study is political propaganda:

But this mathematical narrative rests on several key assumptions that are not backed by real-world data, experts told Wired.

To begin, the authors write that their overall approach “rests on the assumption that only a very small proportion of the population is at risk of hospitabitable illness.” In their most extreme model, the authors estimate that just 0.1% of the population, or one in every 1,000 people, will require hospitalization.

“We can already see just by looking at Italy ... that that figure has already been exceeded,” Tim Colbourn, an epidemiologist at University College London’s Institute for Global Health


“As far as I can tell, the model ... assumes that all those infected, whether they are asymptomatic, mildly ill or severely ill are equally infectious to others,” Paul Hunter, a professor of medicine at the University of East Anglia, wrote on the Science Media Centre site. “This is almost certainly false.” Data suggest that asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic people may actually fuel the rapid spread of COVID-19.

In addition, the model assumes that the U.K. population would become “completely mixed” over time, meaning any given individual has an equal chance of running into another within the region, Hunter wrote. “We do not all have an equal random chance of meeting every other person in the U.K., infected or otherwise,” he said. Without some acknowledgement of the structure of social networks within the U.K.; the relative risk of running into a mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic person; and the risk of severe infection tied to different demographics, the simplified model “should not be given much credibility,” Hunter said.

In comparison, a recent study from Imperial College London included numbers from several Italian villages where every resident received a diagnostic test and might provide more realistic benchmarks for the extent of infection elsewhere, lead author Niall Ferguson told the Science and Technology Committee, according to Wired U.K. “Those data all point to the fact that we are nowhere near the [Oxford study] scenario in terms of the extent of the infection,’ Ferguson said.

In terms of the implied fraction of the population that is already immune: “.. the proportion of the UK population that has already been infected could be anywhere between 0.71% and 56% (95% credible intervals...)”. The model as it stands is useless in terms of narrowing down the key parameters, at least with the restricted data employed.

Additionally any study fitting to cases confirmed by testing may overestimate spread and perhaps also R₀ due to the false positive problem Armstrong had raised and I elaborated. Curiously the paper Armstrong cited has hence been retracted. Hmm. Are papers which go against the official narrative being pressured to be retracted? Are shoddy papers being planted to encourage conspiracy theories?

Armstrong has continued to repeat the erroneous claim that Neil Ferguson retracted the findings of his earlier Imperial College study:

Ferguson now says both that the U.K. should have enough ICU beds and that the coronavirus will probably kill under 20,000 people in the U.K. and interestingly he now admits that more than half of whom would have died by the end of the year in any case because they were so old and sick. Ferguson now predicts that the epidemic in the U.K. will peak and subside within “two to three weeks” after advocating 18+ months of quarantine would be necessary.

Read No, a COVID Scientist Didn’t Walk Back His Prediction. Armstrong is simply wrong on every point quoted above. Ferguson’s models always had two peaks for any scenario involving stricter social distancing. If social distancing is lifted, the second peak can be greater and allegedly also overwhelm the hospital system. The better case (i.e. stricter social distancing and other mitigation) scenarios had the 20,000 deaths for the first peak. He moved the target date of the first peak forward because new evidence suggests transmissibility is greater (and/or starting earlier relative to start of infection?).

Dr. Anthony Fauci explains some of the issues and he also cites what I believe may be the most important factor of all which I had mentioned in my blog Diabolical MERS-derived, “Chimera” Coronavirus Masquerading as the ‘Common Cold’? 23 days ago—early asymptomatic or mild flu-like symptoms transmissibility originating from the oropharynx and nasal cavity instead of from in the lungs as was the case for SARS:

So an infected person with the original SARS had to cough up the virus. Whereas the for nCov-19 (SARS-CoV-2) an infected individual merely has to sneeze or exhale.

Transmissibility may be very high. R₀ would vary to the degree that hygiene, social distancing and (unfortunately!) even more draconain measures are undertaken to combat the transmissibility.

The Ferguson (aka Imperial College) paper concluded that “Suppression” is the only option that doesn’t overwhelm the healthcare system in Great Britain (and the USA).

It appears this virus is designed with early onset, mild-symptom or asymptomatic, very high transmission—so as to blackmail society into totalitarian quarantines. Additionally this new virus has very high mortality and/or longer-term lung injury among the geriatric population:

With those over 65 in the U.S.A. having 3 times more co-morbidities aka chronic infections.

UK Government Downgrades Coronavirus as No Longer Highly Dangerous

It appears to be a political demographics bioweapon designed to accomplish many goals including but not limited to war between the USA and China as China will be blamed for the pestilence that will result from these absurd totalitarian lockdowns that collapse the global economy. Culling many of the elderly radicalizes the electorate by giving the youth a larger share. Culling those with chronic infections and elderly reduces society’s future retirement and healthcare burdens.

However, Armstrong may be correct that we can and should just build more hospitals instead of collapsing the global economy into a Great Depression.

That looks similar to — but more modern, improved than — how we responded to the 1918 – 1921 “Spanish” influenza flu pandemic:

Soldiers from Fort Riley, Kansas, ill with Spanish flu at a hospital ward at Camp Funston

The enemy of a ‘good’ outcome is to seek an [impossible] absolutely perfect outcome.

Choosing totalitarianism over essential liberty is the essence of self-inflicted, enslavement.

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety — Benjamin Franklin

Also the mass media is inciting the memebots to turn us away from teamwork and into a political propaganda clusterfuck.

Our press are propagandists

Yet I’m still concerned about antigen imprinting or antibiotic-dependent enhancement (ADE) due to reinfection or new viral bioweapon two or more years after the initial survived infection. Does this become like a Biblical plague over the years or decade reducing the human population to 500 million? Well I guess we can’t stop that with perpetual quarantines either.

My most immediate concern is how this is an excuse to lurch into authoritarianism, totalitarianism and even global governance. So I agree with Armstrong. But most of the people are scared a.f. and are begging to be enslaved.

And the nations initiating socialism-on-steriods such as the pretext/precursor of universal basic income (UBI) stipends, nationalizing healthcare with Trump forced to use the DPA, nationalizing many industries, etc.. Thus the governments will need to become even more strict about tax collection and capital controls. This is the perfect pretext to establishing the 666 system.

This is far too convenient, byzantine and perfectly timed, suited to have a naturally selected, zoonotic origin, c.f. also. There were even pandemic bonds in place to incentivize the WHO to be complicit.

See section White “Christians” Love Surety below for more on why curtailment is probably worse.

Also from that Armstrong blog:

Socrates has projected it [the virus? pandemic? in UK or worldwide?] would peak by the week of April 6th to the worst-case scenario the week of April 20th.

Socrates is factoring in the quarantines and lockdowns.

More About the Bitcoin Future

Here was Socrates’ [Forecast] array on the Dow [i.e. DJIA] published last November. Besides showing a string of Directional Changes until March, it showed that March would be a Panic Cycle and that volatility would rise February and March.

The Directional Changes on the updated end of March Forecast Array added a Directional Change in April, allowing for a final bottom in April. Volatility plummets in April and action doesn’t pickup again until May. Privately Armstrong has recently blogged that the lowest for the DJIA could be 15,000 in first week of April. He may have also mentioned the first week of April in his public blogs.

Managing Money v Teaching You How to Survive:

Again you said the market would decline into the 23 of March and that should be the temporary low.

Let’s compare to what I wrote in my prior blog about the current Forecast Array for Bitcoin:

Armstrong is warning about his monthly Bitcoin Forecast Array that April has a key turning point and rising volatility. He mentions paying attention to bearish reversals in his Reversals system. So the question is will April be a bearish or bullish turning point for Bitcoin? Readers should subscribe to Armstrong’s Socrates Global Market Watch to obtain full access to this information.

I believe Armstrong may be overemphasizing a bearish interpretation of the meaning of the heightened bars for April.

There was a Directional Change in March which is of course this flash crash underway but remember in 2013 there was a flash crash right before vertical rocket shot to the November 2013 ATH. The start of the flash crash can be the pulling of the SLINGSHOT and thus actually a bullish move! Socrates’ Forecast Array for April has increasing intraday and day-to-day volatility which should be the choppiness of establishing the bottom with wilder swings between finding the low and potentially bounces ranging back up to the $9k to $10k level.

Then day-to-day volatility increases into May which I think could be the bullish acceleration upwards, although it could also be the bearish acceleration downwards of a SegWit attack! Yikes. But I don’t think this already-in-doomsday-SegWit-attack interpretation is likely as I will argue below but also let’s not forget what I had inserted in the top of my prior blog Whither Bitcoin in a Global Liquidity Contagion?:

Did BTC Miners Crash Bitcoin Price With 51 Days Before the Halving?

Would the miners crash the Bitcoin price to gain market share before and during the May 14 halving event so they can >pump the price in June after bankrupting their competition? Or are they crashing the price because the SegWit death spiral is underway now?

The Forecast Array has extreme values in the Longitudinal Wave row for the April and July 2020 columns. Perhaps this could be explained by the opening of the fractal to the larger fractal which is this huge bullish move to the analogous November 2013 ATH as I explained in my prior blog Bitcoin Death Spiral Underway — or Something Else?:

Can Only Be Bullish — Signifies Opening of a Massive Bullish Fractal

It reflects transitioning from a smaller fractal to a large one, due to wave interference from the large fractal. This means the next bullish move is going to be much greater than the one to $13.5k.

This is playing out as my model had predicted.

The July 2020 case could be the forking of the fractal pattern also between the uber bullish legacy Bitcoin and terminally ill Bitcoin Core. A plausible explanation for why there’s no significant bullish nor bearish Trading Cycle extreme value for the entire year until November 2020 when it spikes very bullish, could be that there’s a mixed signal of bullish for legacy Bitcoin and bearish for Bitcoin Core until the market has settled by November at them being separate forks with separate trajectories.

Then there’s rising intraday volatility in June 2020 along with a Directional Change, which could be indecision around the ~$20k ATH, the July 2019 $13.9k peak or the currently ~$10.5k long-term downtrend overhead resistance line that runs from the 2017 ATH through the June 2019 peak $13.9k. That June 2020 Directional Change doesn’t fit a SegWit collapse to near ~$0 scenario, if the March and June Directional Changes are bearish and bullish respectively. The only way the June Direction Change can be bearish (and thus possibly the start of the SegWit attack) is if the March Directional Change is bullish. Thus May/June seems to be breaking through the $13.9k and $20k levels making new ATHs everyday in June until the Bearish Reversal and Directional Change is reached. However if the March Directional Change is bearish but not a SegWit collapse level of bearish, then the June Directional Change would be bullish so the rise in the Bitcoin price could continue after June, although this would conflict with Armstrong’s expectation of cryptocurrencies being destroyed (if he expects that near-term) yet the bearish reversals with a bottoming May would be consistent with his stated expectation. And in that scenario (i.e. no SegWit attack before ~October 2020) the high volatility in May could be the final bottoming process of this current correction. So I’m claiming we can likely determine if a SegWit attack is likely in June by observing whether there’s a new ATH in June. The next opportunity for the posited SegWit attack would be Sept/October 2020 with the rising volatility forecast.

The Long-Term shift in August with a bullish Trading Cycle in November and then very high intraday volatility in December could be a rise heading towards ~$40k$100+k and beyond.

So I can only arrive at bullish outcomes for Bitcoin, including the possibility of a SegWit attack in June or October 2020 which would make Armstrong think Bitcoin had been destroyed to fulfill his predictions and expectations. The Directional Change in March with the SLINGSHOT bottom could be the start of the very bullish phase (to finally break through the aforementioned three overhead resistance levels) which then peaks in June with a Directional Change towards bearish. That June Directional Change could be the peak and start of the SegWit attack.

A June SegWit attack would also correspond with inciting civil unrest in June/July that Armstrong’s computer predicts. The millennials have been big into cryptocurrency as USAFtards and other Ycombinator-esque retarded stuff such as ERC-20 utility tokens, c.f. Let's have fun with Paul Graham.

Let’s remember that even Armstrong was caught off-guard by this manufactured virus crisis. He was not expecting the extreme manipulations although he was expecting a correction from the January 18 ECM date until a March 23 low. So he would also not be expecting a SegWit attack although his bearishness would again be congruent with unexpected manipulations. The very high volatility in June could be the new ATH above $20k peak followed by a crash and then the August Long-term shift with legacy Bitcoin turning bullish by November and the Bitcoin Core cratering into the abyss.

An April crash for Bitcoin on the into the abyss and end of cryptocurrencies would be inconsistent with what we expect for gold. It would mean that cryptocurrency had been identified as a failure to be a hard asset at a critical juncture. Instead I believe the powers-that-be would want to sucker all the greater fools into chasing Bitcoin up to some new ATH with FOMO “Bitcoin is a savoir hard asset in these times of great crisis” and then totally fuck them all because they hodl in non-legacy address even though they were warned many times not to do so. IOW, Bitcoin must not fail to be a hard asset. Instead the users must fail to believe in immutable, hard assets and instead chase egalitarian unicorn fantasy “we can scale Bitcoin for all of us because we have good intentions.”

Satan is ethical. Abstractly the analogous situation is happening with the nCov-19 trojan horse in that the people have been handed a rope long enough to hang themselves and they enthusiastically embraced the necessary hysteria about surety and guaranteed safety thus ignoring the basic tenets of liberty as expressed in for example Biblical 1 Samuel 8, Proverbs and Benjamin Franklin’s famous quip:

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Armstrong could be fooled because he firmly believes nation-states can prevent everyone from using Bitcoin. That’s because he still hasn’t realized that legacy Bitcoin (with immutable 1 MiB size blocks) is not designed for the masses to use as a cryptocurrency. It’s designed only for the $billionaires to use as an international clearing currency and stable global unit-of-account fulcrum in a two-tiered currency system (in the coming monetary reset) from which to enforce discipline on the nation-states. This is Nash’s Ideal Money concept which is also similar to FOFOA’s Free Gold concept but without the weaknesses of gold. The powers-that-be took John Nash’s Ideal Money concept and implemented it with proof-of-work.

So Armstrong thinks Bitcoin will fail. No! The FATF is ultimately controlled behind the curtain by the powers-that-be who created Bitcoin. They will use their control over the Deep State and the FATF to kick off all the minions from Bitcoin as they raise the price to $1 million per coin.

So Armstrong is correct that (virtually) all the cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin Core will die a fiery death due to lack of use-case and intense regulations on users, but he doesn’t understand that legacy Bitcoin is the 1988 Economist Magazine’s Phoenix rising from the ashes of the destroyed global monetary system.

So stated more coherently the March Directional Change could be the shift to a bullish phase from the bearish market Bitcoin has been declining in since the July 2019 peak (or even since the late 2017 ATH because July 2019 didn’t make an all-time-high aka ATH). That would be monumental. But then there’s this pesky Directional Change again in June. If that is to be a shift to bearish, then would that be U.S. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin’s plan to tighten the AML and KYC noose on crypto? Or would it be the posited SegWit donations attack?

The alternatives to the June 2020 SegWit donations attack scenario:

  1. March Directional Change is bearish, so June 2020 will shift to bullish.
  2. March Directional Change is bullish, so June 2020 will shift to bearish because of U.S. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin’s crackdown.

We can probably eliminate #2 by delving further into the theory I cited in my above quote about the miners dumping their Bitcoins exacerbating the crash. I know for a fact that many Bitmain S9 were turned on as the price rose last summer and reactivated this past February as the price climbed back over $8.5k. And right before the crash as the price had declined to $8k, I was being offered S9 at firesale prices. So some miners were in a cash flow squeeze.

Bitcoin Mining Sell Pressure Waning, Supply Shock To Drive Massive Price Increase

Thus Socrates’ Bitcoin Monthly Forecast Array can’t be bearish after June! So either #1 applies or it will be only Bitcoin Core—not legacy Bitcoin—which will be bearish after June.

And we can see that the volatility is increasing. Note the wild price swings today.

That Long-term event in August on the Bitcoin Forecast Array could be when everyone realizes what has happened and that legacy Bitcoin is a thing. So that could explain the massive ramp-up in volatility in September, October, December and January with a Trading Cycle and Aggregate high in November. Appears that November 2020 will be the first peak in the price of legacy Bitcoin perhaps $1 million exactly as McAfee predicted fundamentally revalued upwards by an order-of-magnitude above the ~$40k to $100k June ATH—due to that the donations will accelerate the “unforgeable costliness” valuation model.


The EU is coming first with capital controls and this will drive a stampede of demand for U.S. assets such as stocks but also for demand for Bitcoin.

Germany Stopping Gold Sales & Cash Dollar Conversions? Beware 23rd?

Europe to Confiscate Gold?

Why Confiscate Gold if it is Such a Small Part of the Financial System?

They are seeking to eliminate ANY means of circumventing their negative interest rate policy.


It is solely intended to force everyone into government digital currencies. Then they can just tax whatever they desire.

The excuse for this quarantine is that there will not be enough hospital beds for everyone. The answer is what the Chinese did, constructed emergency hospitals in days. You dod NOT shut down the entire economy like this. People are losing jobs and small businesses will close forever. The damage is far greater than what they pretend to be preventing. Either they are sublimely STUPID, or there is another agenda here.

Europe was on the edge of collapse. They have has negative interest rates since 2014. The central bank could do NOTHING. I explained that there had to be political reform. They are actually doing what I said would have to happen, but sheer force. Europe is losing its freedoms and they will NEVER return.

Armstrong blogged TAX CRS Reporting & Why The European Flight to the Dollar:

The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) is an information standard for the automatic exchange of tax and financial information on a global level. It was put together by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) back in 2014. Its purpose was to hunt down tax evasion primarily for the European Union.


The legal basis of the CRS is the [signatories of the] Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters.

Note the U.S.A. and the Philippines are the only remaining major countries in the world not participating in that totalitarian tax hunt, because they haven’t codified it in their national laws yet.

I remember reading about 10 years ago a Treasury official was to have quipped in private, “We’ll burn the fingertips of the goldbugs up to their elbows.”

Note I agree with everything in the above linked article, except the author does not factor in the stampede of international capital into the U.S. stocks to escape capital controls in EU. The EU is accelerating towards capital controls.

Also Trump will fight to reopen the U.S. Economy in mid to late April as he sees the stock markets declining anew into the (lower?) low Armstrong expects in the first week of April.

By May or so, Bitcoin will shine as what it is best at in terms of being a unit-of-exchange. Moving funds when there are capital controls!

The reason the SegWit attack can’t be until after a moonshot in the price is because Bitcoin must not fail to be a safe haven asset analogous to digital gold (per Satoshi’s whitepaper). Instead we the people must fail to own the digital gold. We plebs will instead choose to own tainted Bitcoins based on the counterfeit Core soft-fork protocol with either a 3 or bc1 address, or even legacy 1 addresses but with tainted Core lineage. Thus we won’t own “unforgeable costliness” digital gold based on an immutable protocol. We own some counterfeit, impostor named Bitcoin Core, which everyone erroneously thinks is the “official” Bitcoin. Official as defined by whom? Certainly not by Satoshi the creator of Bitcoin. Remember I documented recently that Blockstream and Core were funded by the globalists.

Bitcoin and the Winds of Totalitarianism

Will the Virus Kill Fiat Currencies?:

What governments are doing to end paper currencies is in fact destroying the productive capacity of their economies. They will also seize private cryptocurrencies. The object is to force everyone into their digital world that they control to collect taxes that they assume we do not pay.

Proposal for a One World Government Being Floated:

The former Prime Minister Gordon Brown has urged world leaders to create a temporary form of global government to tackle the twin medical and economic crises caused by the Coronavirus. He is no fool. He knows once there is the formation of anything pretended to be “temporary” it exists forever. Why are these people so intent upon trashing our freedoms and converting the world into an authoritarian paradise for them?

Nations are being blackmailed into destroyed Central Banks (so as to usher in Bitcoin for the monetary reset) and socialism-on-steriods with nationalization, UBI and totalitarianism. Governments will need to collect massive taxation after the stagflation spigot of stimulus has REKTD everything into a Mad Max scorched earth.

So governments will eventually be begging the FATF (analogous to how the people are begging for totalitarianism now) to help them regulate Bitcoin so they can collect the tax revenues after they realize Bitcoin subverts their regulations and capital controls for as long as their is jurisdictional arbitrage due to incomplete (i.e. lack of total) cooperation between nations.

We will not be able to cash out at $250k through fiat exchanges. The powers-that-be have a plan with the FATF against us.

That is yet another reason I want to create an altcoin with DEX, so we can cash out to the altcoin even if fiat exchanges are blocked.

To cash out to altcoin means someone is willing to accept BTC as payment at that juncture. Would anyone have the risk appetite to accept BTC after the Segwit attack when many people are likely ruined financially? They will be more aware of transactions censorship and wondering if they could spent the tainted BTC after they receive it from you.

If Bitcoin is rising in price then it means some people want it.

Although many of us may be blocked by regulations limiting which exchanges we can legally sell on, there will be some who can sell in other jurisdictions or trade for gold in their locale.

Bitcoin will continue to subvert the governments’ laws, which is why eventually they must turn to beg the FATF for help. The globalists want the nations to beg to be ruled by international world government.

Thus I don’t expect the FATF regulation of Bitcoin before late 2020 or perhaps early 2021. Armstrong’s Socrates computer is apparently predicting June 2021 as a period of extreme monetary crisis.

Remember Satan honors our free will. Satan can only have our soul if we offer it.

See all the (Western) sheepeople begging for totalitarianism now?

(Satan is the natural negative force/outcome of human civilization and collectivized human outcomes)

White “Christians” Love Surety

I replied:

For all that, it now seems clear that the problem is ICU bed capacity.

I posit that the hordes of memebots are unwittingly proposing to make it worse by advocating strict curtailment. Let me explain…

In my opinion, Hammer and Dance appears to be propaganda.

For the back-of-the-envelope numbers: if ~75% of Americans get infected and 4% die, that’s 10 million deaths

That would be a conflation of the case fatality ratio (CFR) with the infection fatality ratio (IFR). The author seemed to be aware of that but nevertheless runs with that clickbait headline figure presumably to incite a political hysteria.

The Imperial College modeling by Neil Ferguson estimated 0.9% IFR. Neil clarified on Twitter that he has not retracted his model and the 20,000 deaths is one of the UK scenarios in their paper given strict curtailment measures. That study estimated 2.2 million deaths for the U.S.A. with no curtailment.

So why is the fatality rate close to 4%?

If 5% of your cases require intensive care and you can’t provide it, most of those people die. As simple as that.

Provision more hospitals in a matter of days or weeks.

There are 4 million admissions to the ICU in the US every year, and 500k (~13%) of them die. Without ICU beds, that share would likely go much closer to 80%. Even if only 50% died, in a year-long epidemic you go from 500k deaths a year to 2M, so you’re adding 1.5M deaths, just with collateral damage.

Some (many? most?) of those additional deaths would have died (this year or in the few succeeding years) anyway due to their multiple chronic infections.

If we do no containment the infections and deaths will peak and die down within a few months according to the >Imperial College model. Thus ICU beds wouldn’t be displaced for the entire year. Also we can provision more ICU beds within those months. And herd immunity will work correctly.

And the duration of herd immunity is I think the elephant in the room that nobody is paying attention to.

Whereas, if we do only mediocre (leaky) curtailment we run the risk of keeping the ICU beds displaced permanently at lower peak level until 2022 but above the ICU capacity when the virus’s R0 has been reduced below 1 due to much delayed herd immunity. Thus the curtailment can be MUCH worse for the hospital system if we don’t provision enough extra ICU beds because lulled to sleep by the lower magnitude of the exponent.

Worse yet is the black swan risk that immunity only lasts for a year or less (perhaps because of the gain-of-function feature), so people could possibly be infected more than once by 2022 causing more deaths than a single delayed peak would predict. Stretching out the herd immunity would not be possible. Even worse is the plausible black swan hypothesis that these curtailments could amplify the death rate in 2022 due to antibiotic dependent enhancement (ADE) as individual’s antibodies titers fall into the target range. It’s difficult to get people to budget for black swans.

The author cites increased risk of mutations as a reason why would should not let the infections proliferate. That sounds like propaganda to claim that the risk of mutations would be significantly higher with 150 million cumulative infections versus 50 million eventual cumulative infections. The mutation risk to population size is probably non-linear.

Then, release the measures, so that people can gradually get back their freedoms and something approaching normal social and economic life can resume.

Popping the $quadrillions global debt bubble thus initiating a Minsky Moment is an irreversible Great Depression event. I’m afraid it’s already too late to turn back from this horrible mistake in public policy.

And that does not even factor in that strict curtailment seems to be a totalitarianism and socialism-on-steroids power grab which will destroy our Western democracy freedoms.

I smell a rat.


Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more valuable than they? — Matthew 6:26 NIV (quoting Jesus)

Whoever puts up security for a stranger will surely suffer, but whoever refuses to shake hands in pledge is safe. — Proverbs 11:15

“And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. — Matthew 6:5-7 NIV (quoting Jesus)

Jesus says Nations Of The World Are Under Satan, But Paul Says Its Rulers Are Agents of God.

Jesus Says Some Are Righteous, But Paul Says It Is Impossible.

Paul Teaches We Are Eternally Secure, But Jesus Teaches Insecurity to a Sinning Believer.

Jesus Says Only the Merciful Receive Mercy, But Paul Says Only Those God Chooses Arbitrarily Will Receive Mercy.

the Lord […] said, “This is what the king who will reign over you will claim as his rights: He will take your sons and make them serve with his chariots and horses, and they will run in front of his chariots. Some he will assign to be commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and others to plow his ground and reap his harvest, and still others to make weapons of war and equipment for his chariots. He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers. He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive groves and give them to his attendants. He will take a tenth of your grain and of your vintage and give it to his officials and attendants. Your male and female servants and the best of your cattle[c] and donkeys he will take for his own use. He will take a tenth of your flocks, and you yourselves will become his slaves. When that day comes, you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, but the Lord will not answer you in that day.”

But the people refused to listen to Samuel. “No!” they said. “We want a king over us. Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to lead us and to go out before us and fight our battles.”

When Samuel heard all that the people said, he repeated it before the Lord. The Lord answered, “Listen to them and give them a king.” — 1 Samuel 8 NIV

“Do not get any gold or silver or copper to take with you in your belts— no bag for the journey or extra shirt or sandals or a staff, for the worker is worth his keep. Whatever town or village you enter, search there for some worthy person and stay at their house until you leave. As you enter the home, give it your greeting. If the home is deserving, let your peace rest on it; if it is not, let your peace return to you. If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, leave that home or town and shake the dust off your feet. Truly I tell you, it will be more bearable for Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town.

“I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves. Be on your guard; you will be handed over to the local councils and be flogged in the synagogues. On my account you will be brought before governors and kings as witnesses to them and to the Gentiles. But when they arrest you, do not worry about what to say or how to say it. At that time you will be given what to say, for it will not be you speaking, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.

“Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child; children will rebel against their parents and have them put to death. You will be hated by everyone because of me, but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved. When you are persecuted in one place, flee to another. Truly I tell you, you will not finish going through the towns of Israel before the Son of Man comes.

“The student is not above the teacher, nor a servant above his master. It is enough for students to be like their teachers, and servants like their masters. If the head of the house has been called Beelzebul, how much more the members of his household!

“So do not be afraid of them, for there is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known. What I tell you in the dark, speak in the daylight; what is whispered in your ear, proclaim from the roofs. Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell. Are not two sparrows sold for a penny? Yet not one of them will fall to the ground outside your Father’s care.[b] And even the very hairs of your head are all numbered [unlike the stars which are innumerable]. So don’t be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows. — Matthew 10 NIV (quoting of Jesus)

Unlike the fearful, panicked Westerners begging their governments to provide absolute safety by destroying the global economy, the majority of the Mexicans and Filipinos for example are not afraid nor asking their governments to save them and provide perfect surety. Of course some more affluent and “educated” ones are demanding surety.

If the Philippines government doesn’t stop the absurd lockdowns then soon the people are going to riot. I’m in contact with many Filipinos and they are getting pissed off about having to eat sardines and a cup of rice per day because they can’t work. And the barangay Captains are acting like little Hitlers going into people’s homes commanding to wear face masks at all times even inside their own homes.

Mexico’s President Is Resisting Coronavirus Restrictions as the Rest of the World Shuts Down

Coronavirus advice from Mexico's president: ‘Live life as usual’

Mexico Holds Out Against Travel Curbs Despite Trump Restrictions

Millions of jobs at risk in Mexico over coronavirus

Mexico Tries To Boost Economy As Coronavirus Scares Mount

Coronavirus in Mexico: President blamed for slow reaction

Government, WHO report Mexico enters local transmission phase of virus

Mexico Enters Phase 2 Of Strategy Against Coronavirus

Mexico appears to be reacting correctly and not erecting socialism-on-steriods, c.f. also.

The local health officials (and remember the CDC is a privately funded foundation, not a government agency!) and the mass media are trying to manipulate public opinion and foster hysteria and fear as follows:

Mexico suspends large gatherings over coronavirus days after its president urges residents to dine out

Mexico’s coronavirus-skeptical president is setting up his country for a health crisis

U.N. Enslavement of the U.S.A.

“Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government.”
     — Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderberger meeting at Evian, France, May 21, 1992.

(in an address to the Bilderberger organization meeting at Evian, France, on May 21, 1991. As transcribed from a tape recording made by one of the Swiss delegates. )

Water Wars: Colossal Land Grab by the UN and the Feds – Agenda 21 ‘Sustainable Development’ (Depopulation) Program

The Federal government, influenced by the United Nations, is stealing American land and resources as Agenda 21 Sustainable Development is implemented in all states […] The Endangered Species Act (ESA) is an abomination, according to Michael Shaw, as it opens the door for federal authority over State sovereignty. The US Constitution grants the federal government no authority over wildlife! Under the Constitution, States have jurisdiction over essentially all land. Beginning in 1900, federal officials operating under the ‘commerce clause’ enforced federal law to gain authority over certain poaching activities. The adoption of the initial Endangered Species Act was in the 1940’s and the current Endangered Species Act of 1973 is based on a United Nations model! The Department of Interior is now in charge of listing species that they deem endangered or threatened- imagine the power in that. The dubious biological opinions have caused massive resource loss and economic upheaval.

Linkages Between Biodiversity And Implementation Of 2030 Agenda:

The Global Biodiversity Assessment (UNEP, 1995) is the most draconian list of restrictions ever assembled, and it is still the central focus of all UN programs, including 2030 Agenda and the New Urban Agenda. — TN Editor


The 2030 Agenda gives more detail on how that is to be done, along with providing a more specific date for its full implementation.

And the Orwellian doublespeak:

  1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere.
  2. End hunger, achieve food security and improve nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.
  3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being of all at all ages.
  4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all.
  5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.
  6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation.
  7. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all.
  8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all.
  9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation.
  10. Reduce inequality within and among countries.
  11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable.
  12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.
  13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts.
  14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development.
  15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss.
  16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.
  17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development.

From my prior blog Coronavirus Panic Became Necessary Because Testing Was [Intentionally] Too Late:

Israel Claims a Vaccine Ready in 90 Days

Note how convenient that Israel already had an applicable vaccine prepared before this pandemic arrived. So does this mean eventually this vaccine is mandated, such as for international travel or boarding any flight domestic or international?


To reduce Earth’s ~8 billion population to the inscribed 500,000,000 (500 million) means 13 out of every 14 people must die and not be replaced by births.

That inscription conceptually matches the title on the following Denver airport mural painting:

One mural that’s part of the “In Peace and Harmony with Nature” set

One mural that’s part of the “Children of the World Dream of Peace” set

America 2050: Megaregions

As metropolitan regions continued to expand throughout the second half of the 20th century their boundaries began to blur, creating a new scale of geography now known as the megaregion. Interlocking economic systems, shared natural resources and ecosystems, and common transportation systems link these population centers together. As continued population growth and low density settlement patterns place increasing pressure on these systems, there is greater impetus to coordinate policy at this expanded scale.

The Nightmarish Megacities of the Near Future:

The plan for America 2050 is to herd Americans into 11 megacities consisting of six million people each totaling 66 million people. Under this plan, there are no provisions for any other population developments […] It appears that the timetable for the implementation of the megacities concept and the 300 square foot stack and pack apartments is a lot closer that the year 2050.

If a front group for the CIA, Deagel, is correct, we are about a decade away from this hellish nightmare.


Not surprisingly, Deagel has made such a projection and the news is not good for the United States. Below is a list of projected changes for the United States during the time frame covering 2014–2025.


Year 2013: 316 million population, $ 17 trillion GDP
Year 2025:69 million population, $0.9 trillion GDP

Possibly the virus-induced restrictions on travel are tied in with those U.N. coordinated plans cited above. This is a leftist U.N. takeover of the USA. They will kill off a sufficient portion the more conservative elderly population, so that the radicalized, leftist youth will have sufficient proportion to dominate all elections.

The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act:

The Center for Law and the Public’s Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities
For the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]


In the wake of the tragic events of September 11, 2001, our nation realizes that the government’s foremost responsibility is to protect the health, safety, and well being of its citizens. New and emerging dangers—including emergent and resurgent infectious diseases and incidents of civilian mass casualties—pose serious and immediate threats to the population. A renewed focus on the prevention, detection, management, and containment of public health emergencies is thus called for. Emergency health threats, including those caused by bioterrorism and epidemics, require […]

So we can imagine after this is employed to incite a war with China, there can be false-flag, sarin gas attacks on American towns blamed on China when it will probably our CIA that was organizing the attacks as alleged in Syria:


You mentioned that the Oxford article is not peer reviewed.
What about the Imperial College report? I couldn't find it in pubmed. Do you know if it's ben published in any scientific journal?

There's a number of distinguished scientists who also don't agree with the Imperial College report. Some are listed here

The critically important bit in what you linked to is:

A new French study in the Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, titled SARS-CoV-2: fear versus data, concludes that “the problem of SARS-CoV-2 is probably overestimated,” since “the mortality rate for SARS-CoV-2 is not significantly different from that for common coronaviruses identified at the study hospital in France.”

That cited French paper ties into what I added to this blog in section White “Christians” Love Surety. I inserted that since you read my blog, so you may want to read again.

I will blog again about this with a more coherent explanation, because this is indeed the smoking gun!

Thanks anonymint. I did read it again. It was more of a skim the first time through. You paint the big picture vividly. I have a few friends and family that are clued in but so many are still placing their hopes in their government.

In Thailand surprisingly most expats are going along with the premise of the shutdown. The Thais too are frightened, especially young mothers with children, not letting kids out to play. Thais are slow to anger but it will happen soon enough I think if restrictions are not lifted. Tension is building visibly. The supermarkets are fully stocked even with the usual vast array of imported goods. In the last couple days they are checking temperatures and forcing customers to wear masks in order to enter the large supermarkets.

Here’s a video of Filipinos protesting about lack of food and Duterte threatening to “SHOOT TO KILL” them:

Duterte may run out of money to even feed the people. Mass starvation in the Philippines is plausible, but surely the people will revolt before that. Remember Duterte famously said he would drop Soros from helicopter if he stepped foot in the Philippines. Now Soros is laughing because Duterte has been duped into crashing his own economy for a fake virus. Note there may be a new more deadly strain that was dropped on Wuhan. That might be what is coming to get us in 2022 for real next time. I need to research that two virus hypothesis more.

I have first hand reports from Philippines that people have run out of food. And government aid is not reaching them. Some are eating “corn fungus.”

Not difficult to extrapolate this to see how it could play out over a large part of the earth.
Even if a country is self-sufficient in food production (net exporter of food) specific regions can be sealed off one by one.