TOP 200 effective Steemit сurators that encourage discussion for the 2017.09.21

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

image source

---

What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales. But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.

But this time we will review those curators who reward the discussions, that is, they vote for the comments of other users.

According to the ideology of the Steemit creators, the discussion is as valuable an element as the author's content. Confirmation of this is the allocation of a separate pool of awards for comments.

---

How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published rewarded comments for the period under study is determined.
Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.

---

4287 authors published their rewarded comments during this day.

4456 accounts participated in the comments curating according to information from the database.

26705 votes were made during this day.

2748,88 SBD - is the total author rewards for this day.

---

TOP-200 effective comments curators for September 21, 2017

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@good-karma	497	367	0	141,63	5,15	12,12
2	@greenman	130	85	34	166,42	6,05	3,3
3	@surpassinggoogle	86	63	1	63,78	2,32	0,94
4	@gentlebot	77	73	100	41,49	1,51	0,71
5	@thing-2	73	68	100	39,02	1,42	0,62
6	@timcliff	94	65	11	30,53	1,11	0,46
7	@esteemapp	483	359	1	4,83	0,18	0,4
8	@bitcoiner	434	339	0	4,34	0,16	0,34
9	@pharesim	61	51	0	17,76	0,65	0,21
10	@gamer00	76	52	6	14,35	0,52	0,17
11	@jesta	496	60	0	9,92	0,36	0,14
12	@the-alien	51	44	67	11,75	0,43	0,12
13	@roelandp	10	10	25	47,21	1,72	0,11
14	@joeblack1	71	25	5	17,52	0,64	0,1
15	@happymoneyman	37	31	27	11,96	0,44	0,09
16	@hebrew	13	12	61	30,51	1,11	0,09
17	@exyle	38	32	3	11,78	0,43	0,09
18	@adm	484	1	2	335,68	12,21	0,08
19	@cm-steem	20	17	78	19,2	0,7	0,08
20	@streetstyle	27	27	13	10,58	0,38	0,07
21	@rebeccaryan	46	39	16	8,17	0,3	0,07
22	@kaylinart	32	22	15	12,2	0,44	0,06
23	@onceuponatime	12	10	11	24,41	0,89	0,06
24	@elyaque	56	54	4	4,44	0,16	0,06
25	@lyndsaybowes	51	34	4	6,57	0,24	0,05
26	@ats-david	17	17	2	12,92	0,47	0,05
27	@ackza	38	27	32	6,08	0,22	0,04
28	@ramta	3	3	83	53,45	1,94	0,04
29	@michaelstobiersk	41	30	39	5,41	0,2	0,04
30	@tommyhansen	18	13	24	11,83	0,43	0,04
31	@warofcraft	37	30	13	5,28	0,19	0,04
32	@talanhorne	21	21	50	6,11	0,22	0,03
33	@creadordelfuturo	32	27	5	4,48	0,16	0,03
34	@extrospect	10	1	100	136,82	4,98	0,03
35	@inventor16	26	23	50	5,73	0,21	0,03
36	@simonjones	4	2	100	65,62	2,39	0,03
37	@mammasitta	33	29	12	5,12	0,19	0,03
38	@megaspore	9	7	100	16,87	0,61	0,03
39	@rivalhw	36	28	14	3,06	0,11	0,02
40	@mattclarke	22	18	27	5,74	0,21	0,02
41	@blocktrades	2	2	5	37,06	1,35	0,02
42	@alexbeyman	15	12	47	8,91	0,32	0,02
43	@exploretraveler	11	9	21	7,99	0,29	0,02
44	@enazwahsdarb	37	33	2	2,48	0,09	0,02
45	@kafkanarchy84	23	22	9	3,54	0,13	0,02
46	@tipu	124	44	3	1,76	0,06	0,02
47	@canadian-coconut	13	10	1	7,94	0,29	0,02
48	@cryptoeagle	31	16	55	4,17	0,15	0,02
49	@broncnutz	21	18	4	3,94	0,14	0,02
50	@twinner	40	23	1	2,94	0,11	0,02
51	@hanshotfirst	30	30	1	3,35	0,12	0,02
52	@chris4210	8	5	100	14,93	0,54	0,02
53	@bubke	14	14	47	5,27	0,19	0,02
54	@steevc	36	26	9	3,19	0,12	0,02
55	@jwolf	23	18	3	4,08	0,15	0,02
56	@overkillcoin	43	26	12	2,9	0,11	0,02
57	@lifemovedbysteem	31	25	12	1,08	0,04	0,01
58	@fur2002ks	21	21	20	1,18	0,04	0,01
59	@doitvoluntarily	11	10	75	4,83	0,18	0,01
60	@uplus	8	2	100	20,19	0,73	0,01
61	@perpeper	11	10	50	2,73	0,1	0,01
62	@darthnava	15	15	6	2,04	0,07	0,01
63	@lukestokes	10	9	5	3,81	0,14	0,01
64	@v4vapid	8	8	1	3,66	0,13	0,01
65	@laodr	12	10	100	3,06	0,11	0,01
66	@floridasnail	24	22	5	1,21	0,04	0,01
67	@kus-knee	9	8	7	2,85	0,1	0,01
68	@ace108	7	7	14	3,88	0,14	0,01
69	@bcc	2	2	100	14,02	0,51	0,01
70	@thedamus	32	18	49	3,11	0,11	0,01
71	@cognoscere	15	13	5	1,71	0,06	0,01
72	@storcogato	13	1	100	22,11	0,8	0,01
73	@booster	2	2	11	16,89	0,61	0,01
74	@diskorvery	8	3	63	9,69	0,35	0,01
75	@guyverckw	46	27	20	2,31	0,08	0,01
76	@humanearl	4	4	100	6,68	0,24	0,01
77	@hyokhyok	18	17	21	1,75	0,06	0,01
78	@meesterboom	62	31	1	1,57	0,06	0,01
79	@greatpath	14	14	5	4,2	0,15	0,01
80	@englishtchrivy	22	11	11	2,31	0,08	0,01
81	@lichtblick	30	27	1	1	0,04	0,01
82	@alao	16	10	59	3,57	0,13	0,01
83	@janusface	14	11	11	4,91	0,18	0,01
84	@ericvancewalton	7	6	100	3,8	0,14	0,01
85	@uwelang	25	18	9	2,05	0,07	0,01
86	@lordoftruth	7	2	51	17,23	0,63	0,01
87	@babsboard	6	4	100	6,44	0,23	0,01
88	@btu	3	3	80	15,89	0,58	0,01
89	@ew-and-patterns	16	11	23	2,87	0,1	0,01
90	@nhj12311	25	25	21	1,29	0,05	0,01
91	@surfermarly	10	10	42	5,48	0,2	0,01
92	@liondani	4	3	100	12,3	0,45	0,01
93	@knircky	3	3	100	16,62	0,6	0,01
94	@margaretwise	41	36	7	1,68	0,06	0,01
95	@lpfaust	19	13	24	2,5	0,09	0,01
96	@steemit-life	21	21	13	1,37	0,05	0,01
97	@onealfa	4	4	80	10,96	0,4	0,01
98	@crypt0	9	9	31	2,97	0,11	0,01
99	@enomujjass	16	15	15	2,58	0,09	0,01
100	@slowwalker	3	3	21	14,47	0,53	0,01
101	@quinneaker	16	13	12	2,78	0,1	0,01
102	@dwinblood	28	18	5	3,11	0,11	0,01
103	@gardenofeden	23	8	6	4,52	0,16	0,01
104	@eric-boucher	22	5	18	4,33	0,16	0,01
105	@dragosroua	30	24	10	2,1	0,08	0,01
106	@raybrockman	12	10	14	2,88	0,1	0,01
107	@greenjuice	16	15	7	1,5	0,05	0,01
108	@louispark	13	13	20	2,83	0,1	0,01
109	@deanliu	5	5	100	12,02	0,44	0,01
110	@nitesh9	1	1	100	0,03	0	0
111	@dbzfan4awhile	6	6	32	0,14	0,01	0
112	@exxodus	1	1	100	0	0	0
113	@openart	17	16	100	0	0	0
114	@juvemi46	1	1	100	0	0	0
115	@overdose	1	1	100	0	0	0
116	@gabbspitargue	1	1	100	0,04	0	0
117	@kondor1030	1	1	31	0,05	0	0
118	@rodgerpetrik	4	4	100	0	0	0
119	@btcbtcbtc20155	10	0	100	0,9	0,03	0
120	@capari	8	7	100	0	0	0
121	@fatema	1	1	100	0	0	0
122	@chelsevans1	1	1	100	0	0	0
123	@alktoni	1	1	100	0,07	0	0
124	@olegw	1	0	100	0,05	0	0
125	@moala	2	1	100	3,65	0,13	0
126	@dimensco	3	2	100	0	0	0
127	@chillimilli786	3	0	100	0,03	0	0
128	@fitinfun	4	3	80	0,32	0,01	0
129	@reveur	1	0	100	0,04	0	0
130	@santoshkrlko	1	1	100	0	0	0
131	@minismallholding	1	1	100	0	0	0
132	@digiworld	1	0	100	0	0	0
133	@grazie	3	2	100	0	0	0
134	@jamiesamain	1	1	100	0	0	0
135	@sighmanjestah	1	1	100	0,02	0	0
136	@lovedj	1	0	100	1,2	0,04	0
137	@flipstar	15	12	1	0,45	0,02	0
138	@mrkrille	2	2	100	0	0	0
139	@silverbug	1	1	100	0,04	0	0
140	@zaragast	2	2	50	0,1	0	0
141	@mimy	1	1	100	0,01	0	0
142	@amanardis	2	2	100	0	0	0
143	@austinm	1	0	100	0	0	0
144	@xdream	3	2	100	0	0	0
145	@kubbyelizabeth	6	5	47	0,2	0,01	0
146	@tulston	3	0	100	0	0	0
147	@absolutelywoman	8	4	92	0,92	0,03	0
148	@diviati	7	3	100	0,8	0,03	0
149	@guymandude	1	1	100	0	0	0
150	@alpha-dog	1	1	100	0	0	0
151	@kiimo	1	1	30	0,03	0	0
152	@phoenix69	6	0	100	0	0	0
153	@chasmic-cosm	1	1	100	0,01	0	0
154	@padmakshi	6	6	100	0,06	0	0
155	@nyarlathotep	1	1	100	0,02	0	0
156	@mrnobody	3	1	100	0	0	0
157	@affiedalfayed	2	0	100	0,02	0	0
158	@dunsky	1	1	100	0,02	0	0
159	@wereviewit	1	1	100	0,08	0	0
160	@amanrazz	2	1	100	0	0	0
161	@otega	1	0	100	0	0	0
162	@pastorike	5	4	100	0	0	0
163	@macchiata	2	2	100	0,01	0	0
164	@ibrahim20172	2	2	100	0	0	0
165	@ahmed9971	2	2	100	0	0	0
166	@benilda	3	1	100	0	0	0
167	@nader2102	2	2	100	0	0	0
168	@barcisz	1	1	10	0,01	0	0
169	@sophie.j90	2	2	100	0	0	0
170	@john23	2	2	100	0	0	0
171	@markz19	2	2	100	0	0	0
172	@lizziesworld	1	1	100	0,01	0	0
173	@jonathan332	2	2	100	0	0	0
174	@sarahm0	2	2	100	0	0	0
175	@martin289	2	2	100	0	0	0
176	@rodger.crs2	2	2	100	0	0	0
177	@farah32	2	2	100	0	0	0
178	@paris483	2	2	100	0	0	0
179	@ades	5	4	44	0,07	0	0
180	@anna2	2	2	100	0	0	0
181	@james902	2	2	100	0	0	0
182	@david.sam130	2	2	100	0	0	0
183	@jasmine2	2	2	100	0	0	0
184	@justin0192	2	2	100	0	0	0
185	@omar4260	2	2	100	0	0	0
186	@michael.co1	2	2	100	0	0	0
187	@fabulousfungi	2	2	100	0	0	0
188	@osm0sis	1	1	10	0,01	0	0
189	@hendrikcrause	1	1	100	0,01	0	0
190	@miracleman	1	1	100	0	0	0
191	@xtrodinarybruh	1	1	100	0	0	0
192	@corinnaherden	1	1	100	0	0	0
193	@kj50114	10	0	100	2,61	0,09	0
194	@stefen	2	2	100	0,02	0	0
195	@davidcross	1	1	100	0	0	0
196	@hirzanrifqi	1	0	100	0	0	0
197	@majes.tytyty	1	0	100	0	0	0
198	@family.life	2	2	100	0,04	0	0
199	@tamacvet	1	1	100	0,01	0	0
200	@scottish01	5	4	100	0,2	0,01	0

---

Now you know all these heroes. Their daily work increases the interest in the discussion, gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit and makes existing users remain.

---

Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.