I understand what you are saying, and you are right.
The reason @OriginalWorks identified it as Original Work is because of those opinions.
The only problem is that there are no sources provided for the description information. Please add a link somewhere in your article pointing to the source. I have contacted you on Steemit chat if you would like to discuss this further.
Otherwise it is a great article!
Keep steeming! I have followed you with my main account!
This is not fair. Descriptions of products are not mine to change ? They are descriptions. my own opinion under it is what counts.
I understand what you are saying, and you are right.
The reason @OriginalWorks identified it as Original Work is because of those opinions.
The only problem is that there are no sources provided for the description information. Please add a link somewhere in your article pointing to the source. I have contacted you on Steemit chat if you would like to discuss this further.
Otherwise it is a great article!
Keep steeming! I have followed you with my main account!
Very curious about this "Double Shuck" :)
Try it when you get the change i will try to get the source tomorrow.
edit: added sources
You are welcome!