Sort:  

I think it does :-). Producers could make beats and sell the exclusive "signed digital copy" for each one as a token. Imagine fans literally racing each other to throw $50 at an up-and-coming producer for each day's beat, so they can be the one to own the "signed" copy. Seems dank AF

I hope the legal system catches up to this!

Does it need to? I already sold my first rare digital art in this thread, fairly certain there is nothing illegal about it. I'll declare the income on taxes like I do with any other sale.

What makes you think this would have a legal issue? Im curious to hear

What I meant is for it to be recognised in the legal system as a form of content rights/ownership.

I'm listening to you but not sure I understand -- sorry for being pedantic -- what do you mean by "someone rips me off" in this context?

If someone rips off the artwork, for example if tomorrow someone publishes a clear ripoff of my artwork here, it is equally illegal as it is with non-tokenized artworks, I think. Am I misunderstanding you?

Court accepts evidence of ownership of loop due to service you blogged about

I think that already exists. That's already illegal if Justin does that

My point is that it is accepted as tried and true evidence.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 55255.10
ETH 2314.82
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.33