You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: I Just Issued My First Rare Digital Art Via Ascribe.io (Steem Exclusive Art Giveaway - Only 5 in Existance!)
I think it does :-). Producers could make beats and sell the exclusive "signed digital copy" for each one as a token. Imagine fans literally racing each other to throw $50 at an up-and-coming producer for each day's beat, so they can be the one to own the "signed" copy. Seems dank AF
I hope the legal system catches up to this!
Does it need to? I already sold my first rare digital art in this thread, fairly certain there is nothing illegal about it. I'll declare the income on taxes like I do with any other sale.
What makes you think this would have a legal issue? Im curious to hear
What I meant is for it to be recognised in the legal system as a form of content rights/ownership.
I'm listening to you but not sure I understand -- sorry for being pedantic -- what do you mean by "someone rips me off" in this context?
If someone rips off the artwork, for example if tomorrow someone publishes a clear ripoff of my artwork here, it is equally illegal as it is with non-tokenized artworks, I think. Am I misunderstanding you?
Court accepts evidence of ownership of loop due to service you blogged about
I think that already exists. That's already illegal if Justin does that
My point is that it is accepted as tried and true evidence.
Ahhh I gotcha. Ya. It would be amazing if there was a global standard by which any artist could pull out their own OG "proof of ownership/rights" token. Cool now I understand, I'm glad I kept asking.