RE: I cashed in Steem, plans for the Appalachian Trail, and body painting a Maxim model!
I think society should look down on women that try to get by in life with looks because at it's base, it's really just a primitive game to try and exploit men for resources - the path of least evolutionary resistance in natural selection - so a man would be wise to stay as far away from women like that as possible.
Having said that, you seem to have more talent due to the art skills, enough looks, and bigger tits than the model, so it's weird looking at posts like this seeing two women try to quantify a social hierarchy based on looks, then form a division of labor to determine whose life has more value and which one should get paid for people to...look at them while the other gets shafted.
TLDR: Why does the model get paid more than you to just stand there and do nothing when you have more talent? lol
....Thanks for keeping it positive. :)
“Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed. Results like these do not belong on the résumé of a Supreme Being. This is the kind of shit you'd expect from an office temp with a bad attitude. And just between you and me, in any decently-run universe, this guy would've been out on his all-powerful ass a long time ago. And by the way, I say "this guy", because I firmly believe, looking at these results, that if there is a God, it has to be a man.
No woman could or would ever fuck things up like this. So, if there is a God, I think most reasonable people might agree that he's at least incompetent, and maybe, just maybe, doesn't give a shit. Doesn't give a shit, which I admire in a person, and which would explain a lot of these bad results.”
More power to her. She has to use it while she has it. We men have more options as we age. No need to be jealous of a 23 year old strutting her stuff. She'll eventually be burdened with the financial responsibility of children. Women have a difficult balancing act. My only concern would be that their kids have some stability. But heck I was raised by gypsy parents who moved every 6 months. I guess it turned out okay, but maybe that was due to my really great grandparents who came from the WW2 generation (pre Elvis Presley when shaking your leg on TV was a blasphemy). I know times a changin'.
Enjoy.
And thanks for sharing a Maxxim model with us. Just wish we could have seen a few more closeups of her to know her personality better. Modelling poses don't really let me see the personality (not that I am against the one her laying on the deck mind you, lol).
I vaguely remember glancing at your earlier blogs and I had the impression you were blazing rebel trails in terms of art. You seem hardcore far out. I don't really know how to describe it but not Jane the girl next door. Yet we see also in this blog your parenting side as you mention your daughter.
I find people interesting. Each one is unique. Wish I had more time to know all of them.
I kinda agree, BUT men can exploit ladies with $$ and looks too...it works both ways. It's not my money here anyway, it's just my votes. :-)
@r0ach they aren't exploiting us. We are shopping.
I think that's a shitty response for numerous reasons. Male & female relations are a zero sum power game. If you approve of that female behavior, it's the equivalent of putting them up on a pedestal saying their life is more important than yours. Paradoxically, the female considers that behavior of acknowledging them as desirable as indicating you to be a "beta male", lowering the value of your worth further.
It's a case of - if you give women an inch, they will attempt to take a mile. You can never ever subsidize bimbo behavior, because at the end of the day, the sole purpose of bimbo behavior is to attempt to try and extort resources from the male. That and it's other purpose is to try and get multiple males to fight to the death over the woman as a "prize" to serve a natural selection function.
By buying into this nonsense and subsidizing bimbo behavior, you're essentially decreasing your own lifespan and resources in the process. This means men should collectively shun bimbo behavior as unacceptable as the only logical move when the alternative is entirely negative for society.
The bimbos eventually start to amass a significant amount of resources from exploitation, but these are unproductive resources. It's like the difference in giving a billion dollars to Bill Gates versus Anna Kendrick. One might do something to push civilization forward, or stop it from imploding at the very least, while the other is just going to use it to subsidize bimbo behavior even more, hastening the collapse of civilization.
Ummmm...I'm pretty sure there's a study somewhere on how unhappy people die sooner than happy people.
Or is it unhappy men die sooner?
Being an ex-bimbo and a blonde, it's hard for me to remember factoids.
It is all an evolutionary game. Females typically (but maybe not all) need someone around to help pay the bills and raise the kids, and all the while they'll also be vulnerable to any bad boy alpha who offers a genetic upgrade. They are selling and we are buying, unless you are alpha then they are buying. The alpha has more options than time. So as I said for most men, we are shopping and they are selling. If your in the friend zone, they are only renting with limitations. It is just a fact of how evolution works. If you are alpha, you wouldn't complain.
Ah I don't spend more than 1% of my resources on a female, ever since I was taken to cleaners in my ignorant youth. And I found I get higher quality this way too. The more you spend, the more beta you are by definition. If you are wealthy, then 1% can be quite a comfortable life for her.
Btw I also believe one can have a passionate, caring, meaningful relationship and still not be her floormat.
Also don't let images fool you. Even the model who looks to have a bad ass snob attitude, it's just facade. There is a women behind that facade who is will be weak for her bad boy toy.
I agree with you in some ways. Its annoying for us intellects to have a "dumb blonde" who has an IQ of 2 have a post worth $15,000 standing in her bikini. However, not all really good looking women are clueless. Some actually do have brains and use them.
If you were so smart that you were a $billionaire, you wouldn't give two fucks about $15,000. Wouldn't even reach down on the road to pick it up.