You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: 🎬 Tripping around the Interference Zone

in #art7 years ago

Although science and philosophy are are related, actually they are two far corner of a square. The common point is just curious. Both science and philosophy ask the unknown but science must be realistic meanwhile philosophy may not be. If you cannot prove something you believe it is just a tought similar as philosophy.

There are some exceptions for this. For example, Einstein postulates that nothing can pass speed of light. This can be philosophy also. There are some explanation about this issue but this is not a theory. Also there is no confliction with this postulates so we can use this postulates describing somethin. For some calculations we need these kind of postulations. However, you cannot say there is no gravity without any explanation. In philosophy you can. Philosophy can be limitless,but science cannot be.

Sort:  

This book I took the quote from is actually all about this topic. It explains how the current scientific methodology itself can be seen as a religion based just on sensual phenomena / empiricism, coming to outrageous conclusions about reality which outperform many of the religious myths in its stupidity.

I would like to congratulate you for making such a good description.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.16
JST 0.029
BTC 63013.55
ETH 2460.64
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.64