Could We Colonize the South Pole? How Would We Do It?

in #antarctica7 years ago


source

My article the other day about the upcoming overhaul of McMurdo did well enough that it seemed to me a good idea to delve more deeply into the topic of Antarctic settlement. Obviously, given the numerous research bases there, it's possible for large human populations to dwell there long term.

However these bases are bespoke, designed and built to be one-off installations with numerous expensive mechanisms to adapt them to the harsh Antarctic environment. Cost saving measures will be necessary to build enough living space for millions of people per population center at an economically feasible price point.

Such a design study was carried out in 1958, in search of new applications for the then burgeoning nuclear power industry. Where do you really need a nuclear reactor? Where on Earth will nothing else but nuclear power do the job? Besides in nuclear submarines, the polar regions are also an ideal candidate.

This was the reasoning behind Iqaluit, a concept for an Arctic settlement that would support a population of 4,500. It was to be constructed on the shore of Frobisher bay and would've consisted of a ring of apartment buildings encircling a communal use concrete dome under which there would be a lush, green park .


source

24/7 access to this natural space would stave off the worst psychological effects of living full time in such a harsh, cold, bleak environment by the thinking of the project designers. Contrast this with existing cities within the Arctic circle like Norilsk where citizens somehow make do without such amenities.

Materials science has come a long way since then. A bilayer of EFTE plastic with air trapped between the two laters like an inflatable pillow would make for a dome with the same or better insulating properties, except it would be transparent, admitting ample natural sunlight.

This type of dome has already been in use for many years at the Eden Project, which I've written about in the past. The advantages of this technique are proven, and the data collected so far could be used towards a vastly larger, more ambitious project at the South Pole.


source

This would permit comfortable temperatures year round and insulation from the worst weather Antarctica can muster. It would be energy intense in terms of the heating cost, but that's where nuclear power comes in. There have been failed experiments with extreme cold weather nuclear power in the past (Project Ice Worm) but the technology has come a long way since then.

The abundance of waste heat produced this way would no longer be "waste heat" as it could be used to continually melt ice into drinking water. The unusually cold environment would also be especially safe for a nuclear reactor, and the abundance of self-replenishing ice and snow would enable it to make its own coolant wherever it happens to be situated.


source

Besides providing comfortable living conditions for the families of miners and oil workers once the Antarctic Treaty expires in 2048, the domed settlement would serve as a proof of concept for future large scale dome projects such as the one frequently proposed for Houston, to shield it against hurricanes.

This would prevent the need for the buildings inside the dome to all be constructed to the standard necessary to withstand Antarctic winters, like the Amundsen Scott South Pole Station and other research bases out on the ice.

However should support for constructing the dome not materialize, it would still be feasible to build cities out of structures like the ones already in use at the South Pole, it would just financially constrain the rate of growth and offer an inferior quality of life for residents.

At any rate, if Iqaluit was considered feasible in 1958, we could surely do the same today, and we should expect to see movement in that direction once the Antarctic Treaty expires. Iqaluit and the preponderance of modern research bases afford some idea of what we can expect future Antarctic population centers to look like.

Will you, or your descendants, be among the first civilians to settle there?


Stay Cozy!

Sort:  

Not only what you mentioned, but it would actually produce more power, if set up to do so. That is because of secondary power generation. In power plants where the source is heat, such as nuclear, or coal, or natural gas, the primary generator is often a steam turbine, while many have a secondary heat engine. This secondary heat engine produces power through the heat differential between two sources. They use these in Texas and Arizona even, so the differential doesn't have to be that great to produce power, but the greater it is, the faster the liquid or gas moves between the heat source, and the cooling, and the more power is produced. This is how power is often produced for geothermal power, unless they drill down so deep that they can simply use steam.
I personally would love to live there for a while, if they get faster internet. I'm not using that satellite crap. I actually like sleeping with my window open in 30F degree weather. (just above freezing, or right at it, about 0 deg C) So maybe I could save money on heating while I'm sleeping, and be perfectly fine with it.

First it was Dubai which is known as man base land n we can probably see hiw much Dubai had developed. Similarly, Antarctica will also soon be place for humans and a developed one.

If this were to happen, I'd see the most likely scenario being that any large-scale build would happen for government/military projects, followed by corporate if there's profit in moving the workforce there.

Nuclear is a sensible option for power, but that guarantees it being a government project, at least for oversight/approval purposes. That's for the USA, don't know what the rules are for other countries as far as building a nuclear reactor, but the fissionable material is subject to a number of international laws regarding safety & transport.

Personally I think its inevitable that one day mankind will populate Antarctica. If I had to put a timeline on it I would guess 2048 because thats when the Treaty expires. The world is never free of conflict somewhere so its inevitable that at sometime, someone will seize the opportunity to grab a chunk of Planet Earth that is almost twice the size of Australia.

The environment will suffer as a result. The planet will also suffer. We will all be worse off as the hunt for (and subsequent recovery of coal and oil) becomes part of daily activity.

By then mankind will have solved the issues of a hostile continent. Penguins will decline quickly in numbers, particularly Emperor’s if they still exist.

I pray that none of the above ever occurs. But if it does then I hope the good Lord has taken me elsewhere by then because I never want to see Antarctica extensively populated.

We are now seriously developing and making ready the technologies needed to support lots of humans with drastically less environmental impact. Antarctic settlement stands to benefit, as we have a clean slate there and could build Antarctic civilization from the ground up to be as clean and unobtrusive as possible.

@alexbeyman,
Actually it might be a good idea for the people who wish to find a new land to live by stay away from damn current politics :D But for me, this is not a good idea at all!
#1. Where human went, they polluted that space
#2. For me it looks like colonized on Mars or Titan :D
#3. It's costly and we can use that funds to make millions of houses for the people who doesn't belong one

Likewise, for me it's a bad idea! Specially I hate to see humans at such places, coz I know what they do next (Included me too)
Anyway great article from you dude!

Cheers~

with the recent discoveries made in Antarctica i can understand why people might look to it as a new place to possibly live. however with the way we live today in our societies do you really believe that colonizing the last pristine and undiluted place on the face of the planet. now if we could say sort reversing the damage that we have already done to the planet then i don't think it would even be necessary for us to colonize it. and maybe use it for other things such as a sanctuary or a resource incubator possibly.

yes, I like it, thanks again for sharing nice post
@followed and upvoted for you

Great post sir.

future technology...
that will be most powefull

Alex - we can colonized there, but living in a limited premises never makes me good feeling after all... So, it's a good place to spend a vacation.... But to live a life as it is, I think it's not a suitable place.... You talked about it well in this article....
To get more audience, I wish to ReSteem your post....

+W+ [UpVoted & ReSteemed]

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63098.94
ETH 2621.87
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.74