human being. See monster.
monster (mon'stėr). A human-being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal. "A monster . . . hath no inheritable blood, and cannot be heir to any land, albeit be brought forth in marriage; but, although it hath deformity in any part of its body, yet if it hath human shape, it may be heir." 2 Bl. Comm. 246.
- Ballentine's Law dictionary (1949).
It is said that God made man in his image, and put him on earth in dominion over the animals. If that is accepted as truth, how can any man purport to lay claim over another?
Maybe the answer to that is simple, maybe the makers of law simply need to trick men into identifying as animals.
Trick them into identifying as animals, without them even knowing that they are doing so.
If this can be done, the man in essence abandon's his divine birthright, and makes himself subservient to the machinations, or corporations, that have been created by men to rule over the profane (, or godless).
Whether you believe in evolution or creationism, the law is set up in such a way to get you to abandon the notion of God in order that they may have dominion over you. Yet, you are not meant to know that you are doing this. They ascribe false common meanings to their legal words and inject them into the culture in order to bind your mind. That way, they can win the battles, before they are even fought.
Here's one example, they capture your heart and mind with a great character. Then they give him words like this. Or like this.
In both of those clips, the second one you'd have to start from the beginning. Yet, in both of those clips; both men claim to believe in god, with their words, and they are also the heroes of these stories. They also both adamantly claim to be "human beings". I think the culture creators got a real kick out of those productions.
There are multiple layers of meanings, and one of them is meant to make fun of, and or mislead us.
Wonderful reply, and there goes my follow up .LOL. The clips are a perfect example of how this deception and brainwashing has been going on before we were even born, even our parents were brainwashed into believing they were human.
@realtreebivvy by all means follow up though, the more we write about this stuff the more we inject it into public consciousness. You know, the drug laws in the U.S. describe the term 'food' and 'drugs' as something used by "man, or other animals". The phraseology is like a spell that has been cast down upon man, the notion that he is an animal, and therefore subservient to the law as written. If these legal presumptions are not rebutted, they stand as truth. The first person that I am aware of that brought this into the public sphere is a man called Alfred Adask. If you check him out on YouTube he speaks in great depth on the matter. His case was very very interesting, to say the least.