You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: What comes first? Open borders vs. ending the welfare state
Private cities will turn off a lot of people because of the name, but it's nothing more than a person owning a big plot of land and letting people inhabit it according to his/her rule. It's that person's property after all.
Wait... then i am actually completely against it. Cities are century old mammuths that nobody should own.
That's one way to look at it, and I would much rather see that everyone owns his house etc. themselves. But then again, a person should have the possibility to do with his property whatever he wants, so you can't really withhold someone from creating a city on his own plot of land. It wouldn't look like much, but hey, that shouldn't matter :)