You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Can Capitalism Exist Without a State?
"In this view, capitalism is purely and simply: an economic system..."
That warned me. Then one paragraph later came this:
"...we do not view capitalism as a political-economic system, but just as an economic system."
Amidst this, you talk about owners and consent, both political ideas. It's a major contradiction.
As for your not understanding, the libertarian tendency to not understand things is just my point. I write primarily for myself as an exercise and for anyone else trying to understand, now or in the future.
There’s a difference between a political system and a system that has political aspects. since you said you agree that capitalism can exist without a state, that would mean it isn’t a political system as commonly defined. So what definition of “political” are you operating under?