You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Divided by Government – United on Principles
Your use of a hammer and sickle as demonstrations of possessions as opposed to property. Very clever.
I'd also like to point out that your assertion is correct, and it is a universal, a priori fact: one cannot consent to have one's consent violated. We all want our consent respected. It is a phenomenal feat of absurdity that this conception disappears the larger the number of people in the given conversation.
I was going to use a saw as an example, as some other communist had done, but I thought the hammer and sickle would be better for the imagination. I wish I had a hammer and sickle to photograph. I'm a bit disappointed about that.
About consent -
I have an essay that I've been working on and should have it up soon, perhaps by next week.