You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: True Anarchism is not "AnCap" or "AnCom." It is Thinking for Oneself.
but if you wanna enforce your ''private laws'' on me, your a statist, of the facist variety.
Ancap philosophy does not and never has advocated this. I think you are misunderstanding what is meant by those terms. They are all based solely on private property. Thus, if you are on your property, and haven't consented to be governed by said laws or rules, there's not a damn thing another AnCap can do about it.
many ancaps and mutualists do advocate this, not all, but some. Hopefully it will be a downward trend. they cal it private tender law, private militias, which is fine to defend one selfelf or others but not for a market based law system. its just a another form of cracy, not democracy but marketcracy.
Show me where any AnCap defends a legal system not based exclusively on private property.
You can do your own research. I have no obligation to provide it for you but i will do so anyway.
An ANCAP creates a ANARCHOCAPITALIST FAQ and explains private law: http://ozarkia.net/bill/anarchism/faq.html
quote: "Imagine a society with no government. Individuals purchase law enforcement from private firms. Each such firm faces possible conflicts with other firms. Private policemen working for the enforcement agency that I employ may track down the burglar who stole my property only to discover, when they try to arrest him, that he too employs an enforcement agency.
http://lionsofliberty.com/2012/08/22/intro-to-ancap-private-law-pt-1-the-case-against-monopoly/
etc
Right, and none of this supports your initial claim, as I have pointed out. Nobody said you have awn obligation, to do anything. Thanks for the comment.
Might i add that the law enforcement purchased is not limited to his home or land but outside. It states that conflict resolution anywhere is settled this way. A kind of ebay statism