You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Understanding What We Can't See - Conspiracy, "Debunking", and Absence of Evidence - Part Two
This is very interesting, very solid work!
BUT .. surely, a person of your obvious capability, is not trying to say that .. because public figures have in the past been implicated, or were downright guilty of child abuse, that this somehow bolsters the idiotic case being made between the Clintons, Haitian refugees and Comet mf'in Pizza?
In the cases you listed above, there were victims, there was proof, there were court actions, and findings of guilt made based on said evidence. I will be the first to call PizzaGate-deniers a bunch of duped aholes, if ever the same happens.
what I am saying, exactly, is that while there is no proof that PizzaGate is a pedo ring, that the "debunking" that has been done so far has been done by those same DNC approved journalists that guaranteed the suckers that vote democratic that Hillary would win by 10 points, while failing to disclose their D+10 polling samples.
Following from that, and considering that there is a circular logic problem in obtaining proof either way, that people are going to resort to faith either way to make a judgement. People that vote democratic will scrape up every tired rationalization they used to defend every action of that corrupt political party in the past. People who focus in on the pedo angle will note Podesta's "art" and occultism, the Clinton's long time associations with child molesters from Epstein to Weiner, and the long time media tradition of covering up for democrats, and in particular the Clintons.
FWIW, I don't think it's a pedo ring. I think that the pizza code was used to hide illegal political operations.
But since the Clintons are such deceitful scumbags, they themselves destroyed much of the evidence that may have exonerated them.
Well, except for Huma's "life insurance" copies of the entire thing, and those email copies on the phone that Weiner was using to attempt to seduce a minor.
Perhaps the media should have simply said, "there is no evidence supporting the pedo angle", but then if they were to have done an honest job, they would have had to examine the nature of those messages and let the public know how many minutes of pizza the Podesta ring was ordering,
This is a bit of a digression, but it is funny that politicians and "journalists" that spend so much time telling the public that we shouldn't worry if we have nothing to hide don't want to apply that axiom to themselves.