gif

Hello steemitkind! Netflix does it again! More new world order programming for the goyim. After watching "The break" with Michelle Wolf saluting abortion. I just had to share my take on it. Now it's obvious that these are not just the thoughts and opinions of Michelle wolf but those in charge of the program, She's just the messenger pigeon and you are the useless eaters. With that said, let's begin.

But before I critique, the video in question. (About 6 mins)

So essentially what you get out of this, is that abortions are the greatest thing since sliced bread, abortions equal women's rights, men are useless luggage handlers, and abortions should be as on demand as that button on your remote control.

Now before I continue, I'd like to express that I don't think abortions should be made illegal. I do believe that there are circumstances in which abortion is the best option. However, this attitude towards getting an abortion should not be the equivalent of ordering from the dollar menu

Michelle wolf says that "Women have the power to control life and death" but at the same time that power to decide should be made in a thoughtless and cavalier manner.

Michelle wolf also goes on to say that men are uncomfortable with women having that kind of control over abortion. But Michelle, hasn't it been always the angle of men to have consequence/child free sex with as many women as they can? Doesn't women casually aborting fetuses play right into "patriarchy's" hand? How this could possibly woman empowerment escapes me? This is an agenda that only serves those who want to destroy, the population, fertility, and the family nucleus.

Having kids, growing happy families shouldn't be such a negatively viewed subject. Making babies is how we've survived for thousands of years. I'm certainly not telling women to go home and make babies. I'm just saying you have the most incredible, amazing, and toughest opportunity as a woman. That deserves (imo) the upmost respect of all titles in the world, mother. Even though I know women can do anything and become anything they want, they're no less amazing for having chose children over a professional career. But I digress.

Now to show why Michelle Wolf's idea of abortion is bad for humanity. But before I do. Did you know that abortion in Canada is nearly as "on demand" as people like Michelle Wolf Dream it to be, and cheaper than the dollar menu?

source

The abortion pill is throughout Canada and has mostly been made free, except for a few provinces where it still not covered and will run you about 300-400 dollars cad. The pill is prescription based, but I wouldn't be surprised at all when ( not if ) they make these pills over the counter next to the pregnancy tests and condoms.

Personally, I don't think it's such a great idea, especially considering that Canada has one of the lowest birth rates in the world.

This fact is made the more evident by our immigration minister who says that by 2036 100% of population growth will be through immigration.

source

To makes things worse male fertility is down 60% in North America

"Those who oppose abortion rights have criticized this definition, saying the 3 percent figure misleads the public. In a recent New York Post op-ed, National Review editor Rich Lowry wrote a series of analogies to argue that the 3 percent figure “is crafted to obscure the reality of Planned Parenthood’s business:”

"Such cracked reasoning could be used to obscure the purpose of any organization.

The sponsors of the New York City Marathon could count each small cup of water they hand out (some 2 million cups, compared with 45,000 runners) and say they are mainly in the hydration business.

Or Major League Baseball teams could say that they sell about 20 million hot dogs and play 2,430 games in a season, so baseball is only .012 percent of what they do.

Supporters of Planned Parenthood want to use its health services as leverage to preserve its abortions, as if you can’t get one without the other.

Of course, this is nonsense."

source

Planned parenthood was first created by famous eugenicist Margaret Sanger. Now I'm not going to delve into details about her. To sum it up she wanted to eliminate certain groups from the gene pool.

"So far, the prophets of overpopulation have been defeated by technology. But human ingenuity alone can never deliver a final victory in the battle to feed the world -- eventually, population growth will overwhelm the Earth’s ability to provide calories. That’s why in order to put Malthus and Ehrlich finally to rest, a second component is needed -- lower fertility rates. To save both the environment and themselves, humans must have fewer kids.

Fortunately, this is happening. During the lifetimes of Malthus and Ehrlich, humans still tended to have large families, with each woman bearing an average of five children over her lifetime. But shortly after Ehrlich’s book, that began to change:" Source

Thanks for reading here are some related posts of mine.

The Beginning of Birth Restrictions in Canada?

Wake up Canada! You're being replaced!

13 Reasons How and Why They're Normalizing Suicide.

The LGBT Agenda: Pride&Population Control