The conspiracies that won't go away: Brother of 9/11 victim claim the US orchestrated the atrocity as new study shows it was impossible that the third tower collapsed from fire
This week, eminent Alaska University engineers dismissed this explanation. Dr J. Leroy Hulsey, Chair of the university’s Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, said: ‘Fire did not and could not have caused the failure of this building.’
‘More clearly miraculous was the precise way in which WTC7 collapsed [straight down, with an almost perfectly horizontal roofline] into its own footprint. This is the kind of free-fall implosion that can only be caused by a world-class demolition company.’
But there is another perplexing matter regarding this third building. It concerns the bizarre TV reports in the U.S., and the rest of the world, that it had collapsed when it was clearly still upright — announcements made 23 minutes before it had actually fallen down.
Official reports state the steel in the third tower reached a maximum of 1,100f.
It sure looks suspicious when this is the only steel building in history to collapse due to fire along. Why did it collapse in it's own foot print too. You see in the videos that the middle implodes first just like in a controlled demolition and let me remind you that half the build or more is completely unscathed from the fall of the WTC 1 & 2. So there's no way in hell the whole thing should of came down maybe a partial collapse but not the whole thing.
And another thing if building 7 didn't fall until 5pm several hours after the trade center buildings fell why wasn't there any fire fighters in that building putting out the flames? No one died in building 7 so that meant everyone made it out safely even though it was heavily 'damaged' when the towers collapsed so all the stairwells must of been accessible. So why no attempt stop the fires?
Video of fire fighters talking about explosions and audio of loud bangs being heard near the world trade centers and eye witness accounts of explosions in the building. What caused those explosions?
Notice buildings WTC 5 & 6 tooks massive damage but are still standing and building seven is across the street. You don't see to much debrea outside of the WTC Plaza.
Depending on how you look at it it could have to sides. I think it has to do a lot with what kind of person you are. If you are the "so called" conspiracy types of guy (in fact, the person that really sees some of the things that are really happening in the world and it doesn't chooses to be blind, in my opinion) then you maybe have a chance to have a better understanding of things. But if you choose not to see some true facts, you will risk to remain naive and innocent, and you will get disappointed a lot of the times. Anyway, thanks for sharing this article with us, greatly appreciated!
Update!!!
Check out my latest post here :https://steemit.com/life/@benjy87/you-wanted-something-interesting-you-got-something-mind-blowing-2017910t20740270z
Thank you!
It was definitely planned here are a couple more interesting coincidental facts
On the front cover of News Week in 1967 (when they panned to build the twin towers), There is a picture of David Rockefeller who was involved with building them , His watch is set at 9 11
Aeroplane fuel can not burn hot enough to melt steel, they used thermite explosives to cut through the steel and i believe they used 3 small nukes under the ground of each building. As the towers came down the bottom part seem to desintegrate into dust. very well planned demolition indeed.
The Grenfell apartment building that recently was completely gutted by fire did not collapse even after the fire was out. Fire can not bring down the main steel construction of these towers only thermite explosives.
In 1995 6 years prior to the demolition of the twin towers one of the younger member of the illuminati Steve Jackson released an illuminati (new world order) card game one of the cards has the twin towers on fire, another has the pentagon on fire and there are more with drought, tsunami's, Bank collapse etc.
Very strange indeed.
Thats the one. Thanks
Isn't it ironic how cyclone Irma could possibly hit Florida on September 11
Is it really appropriate to use the Grenfell to compare? Reinforced concrete is totally different from structural steel, the amount of steel in it is tiny in comparison... I wouldn't have thought it was a credible argument to start making comparisons to Grenfell.
fair comment bro. clearly looked like a controlled demolition to me. How ever out of respect for the victims I don't want to comment anymore. thanks
agreed, controlled demolition is what it looks like
I don't think we will ever know the truth, with all conspiracy theorys I think There is an Element of truth in them all
Here are a few fun facts about WTC7 that most people are not aware of...
Did you know that the same company that did a multi-month long bomb-mitigation renovation (which were completed on Sept 10, 2001, the day before the attack) to the area of the pentagon that was destroyed on 9/11, also did a series of major renovations to WTC7 leading up to the 9/11 attacks (and were also tasked with cleaning up and rebuilding the pentagon as well as debris removal at the WTC site in the aftermath)?
Did you know that 2.1 trillion USD was announced missing from the pentagon budget by Donalds Rumsfeld (coincidentally announced on Sept 10, 2001 the same day the pentagon renovations were complete) and that the primary records for this missing money just so happened to be located in the impact zone of the pentagon attack, and that the off-site backup records which were held on a secure server in none other then WTC7 in New York were also destroyed that day, removing any possible way to track the missing money (both primary records in pentagon and backup records in WTC7 destroyed in the same attack in 2 different locations)?
Did you know that WTC7 owner Larry Silverstein (who also owned WTC 1 & 2 which he bought just 6 weeks prior to 9/11 and promptly added terrorist attack insurance to both towers) openly admitted to already creating plans to construct a new WTC7 building, plans which were completed prior to the attacks taking place (and on 9/11 had a scheduled meeting in the impact zone of WTC1 to discuss "what to do in the event of a terrorist attack", a meeting he decided the night before not to go to)?
If anyone had told me the day after 911 when we were all online discussing the most obvious controlled demolition in history, that 16 years later, there would still be people arguing this, I would have LOLed like hell :)
Upvoted & RESTEEMED! :)
It was absolutely a controlled fall. It just seems to me, the layperson, that there was something very strange about how those towers collapsed. I'll never forget that morning, my eyes glued to the TV. As the 1st tower began its collapse I was sick to my stomach anticipating the top part would crumble or fall like a tree to one side, at any moment. When it never, I thought it was a miracle from heaven. There is so much evidence proving it was planned and controlled that only a fool would believe otherwise.
conspiracy to get the world's attention, the media is very instrumental in this conspiracy. the goal is only one, pitted the lamb man and then take advantage of the opposite
i still believe and completely agree with you man !
FYI the Daily Mail article is mostly based on the opinion of David Ray Griffin "a retired philospher at Claremont School of Theology in California". A philosopher simply isn't qualified to give anything more than opinion on a hugely technical subject like this - any more than I am with a masters degree in physics. Thousands of people have opinions on this, and not matter what their "gut feeling" is it doesn't mean squat.
The research from the Alaska engineer sounds interesting though. It hasn't been published yet but I guess he's already been giving some leaks about what his conclusions are. Remember that research unless peer reviewed and verified by others inherently questionable. Bias, errors, mistakes can make it a no more than a flawed document. We'll see. If it is good paper worth of publication it will have sold factual information and research with conclusions that stand up on their own without meer opinion, conjecture, and gut feeling.
You can read more about that research for yourself here: http://www.wtc7evaluation.org/ and here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs1XnA-qqMEAUS-gQN5I5Qw
It is sure to be a very popular piece of research!