My Thoughts on the Crowhouse's Recent Video and Commentary Regarding the NZ Shooting

Max is saying the CGI claims are well-poisoning, and that’s possible, he's also implying it's a Black Operation, this as opposed to a lone wolf attack, and that may well be the case. I don’t know about his thoughts on the people in red outfits or why he’s suggesting that those people are the terrorist's handlers, or what he means by the usage of the word handler.

I’m not sure if Igan meant to imply the guy was under mind control, or a crazy who was wound up, or maybe goaded by government agents posing as white separatists into taking violent action? I’d like to know what he’s suggesting with the term handler. Or perhaps he means a government agent in charge of an operative who is executing an off-the-books operation.

One thing is for certain; I’d have trouble with the idea they doped the guy up or put him under mind control if he had the wherewithal to make his PewDiePie remark, which was an obvious troll, I think people have to be careful and define their terms, something as simple as 'false flag' may have many meanings.

Because of well-poisonings from past tragic events, people may have equated the term false flag as meaning ‘fake, or didn’t happen’. The waters get muddied real quick, and I think it’s by design. It reminds me of a quote that’s supposed to originate within government agencies who specialize in perpetrating both shenanigans and conspiracies alike.

If you consider the above saying; it’s a simple set of instructions on how to poison the well, and if a handful of people in government have committed a high profile or sophisticated crime/conspiracy; it would advantage those people to do as the quote says. It serves to muddy the water, fogs the war, and or creates an intricate house of mirrors with added smoke that’s almost impossible for the layman to decipher.

The well-poisoning technique is a trap for people’s minds. When someone suggests a false idea, confused people looking for answers may grasp onto it like a life raft. Many will accept, or internalize the idea as a belief system or BS. We should take great care in what we believe because there’s a lie in every belief; once adopted, a lie can be difficult to escape from.

Just as Max said, I too would conclude the notion of this being faked or CGI is likely a well-poisoning tactic. People with good intentions might repeat the CGI theory because they now believe that government falsifies every major event. Yet, there are many things in the above video I would disagree with, e.g., the random idea that the people in red are handlers seems like a stretch.

Also, when the shooter left the mosque and aimed over the top of the car, he focused on the guy (or gal) running away and not the car itself. This explains why he did not shoot at the vehicle. He scurried about to the front of the mosque to chase the person down. Later, while near the alley to the left of the mosque, the silver car took off and knocked over the cone to which he replied: "Looks like we won't get the bird today boys."

There were at least two men in red, not one. You can see this by paying close attention to the pants worn by the two. The man wearing red who appeared against the wall at the boundary of the mosque’s property did not appear out of thin air.

I slowed it down frame by frame and could determine that as the shooter rounded the corner to the left, the man in red had leaped over the wall, perhaps predicting the path in which the shooter appeared to be heading. The text on the video implies multiple times the men in red are handlers, but without that suggestion, I’d have no reason to come to that conclusion.

UPDATE: After publishing this article, (the censorship Nazis at) YouTube deleted the related video for violating its terms of service. However, Max has since posted more text further clarifying his viewpoint on what may have happened at Christchurch. His theory reminds me of several Derren Brown specials: The Assassin, Waking Up In A Zombie Nightmare, and How To Hypnotise Simon Pegg just to name a few.

It’s an interesting theory, but it seems almost impossible to prove. If you could ask the fictional Jerry Fletcher, it's the formula for a good conspiracy. I.e., when the conspirators commit their crime in such a way, that you cannot prove they did what they did, or how.

If you give it some thought–it’s very similar to a magic trick, and it wouldn’t at all surprise me if the government uses psychologists, hypnotists, and people skilled in magic or misdirection when conducting black operations. Is that what happened here though? Your guess is as good as mine, as mentioned in the film ‘Conspiracy Theory’ if you can prove it, they did something wrong. Is that perchance why they’ve banned the video?