You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit Engagement Challenge | S14W5 | My Favorite Developers on Steemit
Steemit is decentralized. If the system is trying to force users to cut off their earnings by 25% then it obviously fails to prove its decentralization system.
And, to increase steem price, we really really need investors. Nothing else than investors can drive the steem price to skyrocket.
I personally hate centralization, if it will be happened then I will move to Hive.
Edit : I think steam burning should be optional, not by forced. If it is implemented by force then earnings of every authors, curators, investors will be dropped by 25%. That's significant. So, all investors will leave the boat, and Steemit will be turned to be an one curator platform, the steemcurator01 team.
I totally agree with you. "No vote" if you don't burn steem is also a matter of forced burning. I want to talk about another thing. Those in the club100 or club50, receive the majority of votes from the curator team. In the past I have noticed many users getting support from the curator team this way and then power down. So where is its value? Is good quality content not enough to get voting support? I think it's better not to make these support conditions like 25% burn steem, club power up.
However, I completely disagree with the proposal he has given. If someone wants, he/she will burn. Why would everyone do that?
Rightly said, I totally agree with you. Cannot deviate from decentralized system. Just as common users are the lifeblood of this platform, so are investors. But we are trying to go in a different direction rather than attracting the attention of investors. Something should be done to attract the attention of investors rather than spoiling the pulse of users.
It's true, apart from steemcurator01, there are no good supporting curators here, which frustrates the common users even more. Despite working with quality, common users are not getting proper support. We are trying to provide free support to general users through hungry-griffin and shy-fox. But that system cannot be destroyed by taking any wrong decision.
No one cares about this, why are good curators not coming back, why are new investors not coming? Where is our problem? Where are our failures? Let us change our thinking and think of something better for the platform.
agreed :)
Yes, it is therefore, we are asking the Witnesses and the Investors what they think, as in Democracy everyone is allowed to express their opinion.
As to Hive, they have a group of users who decide who they support and who they downvote to zero, if you remember what happened before disintegration with @slowwalker .
Here are two users who were in Hive now in Steemit and there are many such examples, but of course, everyone is free to decide what is better to him or her:
https://hive.blog/hive/@davidesimoncini/warning-on-hive-complaint-of
https://hive.blog/hive/@jaynie/not-a-doormat
Totally agree that 25% earnings to @null should be optional and choice of an individual. No one should be forced to cut off 25% of his/her earnings.
If this happens it will make Steemit more centralized and Investors will surely flee from STEEM.
I do not think that people leave the platform that allows the user to make money just with writing posts but also if the Price of Steem will increase due to less amount of free Steem then those who leave will return, there is no other blockchain that gives an opportunity to earn with minimal or no investment like many users from developing countries are
No one! I repeat no one makes money right away by just writing here.
And can you please provide any kind of data that supports that 25% to @null increased the price of Steem or even increased users?
Free earnings is a great system in steemit & hive. Why do we destroy that great opportunity ? burning steem idea is great, but keep it optional.
Only free bloggers will stay here. Curators will not. They must leave.
Especially free earning by upvote own comment up:
yes, it's my choice:)
and where you set 25% null in your post ? I don't see that.
I checked you last week posts, you never set 25% null benefactor.
I invested here more than 20 million steem, and curated approximately 2 million USD worth. Free users got this.
What's your investment & curation stats ? Would you please, mention ?
[Update : Anyway, I don't feel like arguing with you anymore. You gave the proposal, I gave my opinion.]
Good Night.
You are very right dada, someone most need brain to not argue uselessly this statement is only looking like a fanboy statement without proper research and analysis.
You did a lot but they sees the reward taking part only and forgot how much you invested on the platform how many projects you are running and supporting.
Amar Bangla Blog School has taught more than 250 free users and helped them to achieve ABB Verified tag. They are supported with curation from the start of their journey till now.
ABB has 161, Steem Alliance has 61, Tron Fan Club has 53, Beauty of Creativity has 63, Steem Watcher 11 and Steem Dev 13 Active posters and all supported by RME.
I agree, 25% burning steem can be optional. But there is no basis for making it mandatory to burn 25% of one's income. It would be like imposing on users and curators.
100% agreed.
In a decentralised block chain we never forced anything. Like centralized platform.
100% agreed dada,
this is decentralized platfrom & burning steem can be optional. we never forced anything and anyone in this platfrom.