Congratulations to Sir Winston on a great race!

Hi.

I’ve said it before you should not be allowed to race horses that didn’t run the derby or the Preakness to run in the Belmont it’s just not fair. Horses that ran all three are worthy of running in the Belmont. not the fresh horses that didn’t run in the other two. It’s just not fair.
How Sir Winston totally impedes the two horses. You can see how War of Will almost falls, his backside going sideways causing his front side to lean. He could have gone down and broken his legs. Tell me how this "lane change" is different from the Kentucky Derby. It's really disappointing regardless of what horse is running etc., to see different rules apply. Sir Winston and War of Will have the same owner, so really it is not about anything other than the same rules should apply across the board. Based on this, Maximum Security should be crowned the Kentucky Derby winner.

The same rules for Belmont Stakes are clearly different than the rules for the Kentucky Derby. Watch that final turn full speed AND in slow motion and see clearly how Sir Winston totally impeded two horses. War of Will not only completely lost his stride, but he almost fell. His backside went sideways as a result of Sir Winston cutting him off. Based on this, and no disqualification, they should give Maximum Security the win for the Kentucky Derby. The rules should apply across the board.
Sometimes, the most talented horse doesn't win, Rosario out rode Jose Ortiz, War or Will bumped Tacitus because Rosario cut him off, he lost momentum that cost him the race.actually should have been a Stewards Inquiry and a Claim of Foul by Gaffalione but Didn't Happened.