Another great session. Conservation of language can be difficult at first, especially to those who are used to writing other things (e.g. academic papers for uni). It's necessary to find the balance between the rhythm and the conservation. I have recently read some poems in which the lines were a bit too long, and it is a shame that a beautiful metaphor or message can be weakened by useless words filling the nonexistent gaps.

As for the rest, I like how you presented three styles. I know you said nobody will criticise you for using the first, but when reading, I know that it does affect me. There's a bias and I tend to dislike that first style. Maybe it is wrong to 'judge' on things such as capitalisation; however, I also study psychology and realistically, we all will have subconscious biases before reading just based on the layout and styles. I tend to prefer the second style, however, I have used the third style as it works perfectly for certain poems. I once read a whole poetry collection using the third style (maybe it had a little bit more punctuation, but no capitalisation) -- it was divine. It really works for some poets, as long as the style of the poem fits the writing style.