It's two investors using their stake as they see fit. One wants to allocate rewards, the other wants to limit the allocation.

Yes, of course... that's exactly what it's all about nod wink.

I don't think I'm being victimised.

It was absolutely nothing against me whatsoever.

I do believe that this kind of thing is what will prevent more quality writers from joining this platform and that is what needs to be addressed and sorted out.

Can you see the likes of Stephen King, JK Rowling or Stephen Hawking joining Steemit when all this is going on?

Therefore, their followers won't be - well... following them here. Is that good for the platform?

The potential for earning is the biggest draw - it's what got me here - but there would need to be a bigger payout to balance the risk of getting flagged when you've done nothing more wrong than attracted a reasonable payout in exchange for a good post - a payout I neither expect nor demand, by the way.

I'm not sure I made it clear what my objection on the flag was. I interpret it different to others on the platform, that's clear.

To me it's disapproval - whether that's because they don't like my writing or the payout, or even if they don't like me that's irrelevant, but disapproval that my work isn't worth what someone else believes it is came as a jolt - to me.

If you enjoyed my writing, if I gave you a few minutes chill-out time in which you read my stories (or part, thereof) then who decides what value is placed on it?

Like I said, this needs sorting out and until it is, I honestly don't see any big hitters coming to this platform for anything more than fleeting curiosity.