The Coming Extinction: Anthropocene

in #writing6 years ago (edited)

The Coming Extinction: Anthropocene

I’ll be posting a few articles on this subject in the coming days. As with most horrific truths, it’s unpleasant. So if you want to be happy, stop reading.


There are truths whose weight may be beyond comprehension. Beyond the scope of what we as humans can imagine. Numbers beyond the billions, distances between galaxies, the pattern that holds pi together. Perhaps it shouldn’t be a surprise that a species unable to grasp its own origin, it’s own true history or even the foundations of its economic system, that such a species would be unable to comprehend it’s extinction.

The truth of climate change and its devastating effects on the planet have been known for decades. But how can an eschatology like this be understood, or even more difficult, how could it be acted upon? When you’re told that the very foundation of the planet, its climate, is changing in magnificent and horrible ways, what can a single individual do about it?

And maybe that’s the answer. An individual can do nothing aside preparations for a disaster. Hence, the right-wing streak within the ‘prepper’ phenomenon. Is the inability to change the course of an entire society symptomatic of the brain’s incapacity to grasp the coming extinction? Or is it the other way around: is our fatal obstinacy in the face of environmental collapse not a neurological deficiency, but a social one?

Foundational Collapse

The foundation of capitalist value is stolen labor. Labor is the process of transforming nature into products. In capitalism, that product is a commodity. Nature is the foundation of this process; it’s the reservoir from which labor draws its raw material. Let’s look at the current state of that reservoir.

  • Land degradation costs 10% of the world’s annual gross product source
  • We’ve lost 87% of Earth’s wetland areas source
  • Less than 25% of Earth’s available land has been untouched by development source
  • By 2050, the combination of land degradation and climate change is predicted to reduce global crop yields by an average of 10% This may be up to 50% in some regions. source
  • At the same time, the UN suspects the population will increase from 7.3 to 9.7 billion people by 2050, an increase of roughly 30%. source
  • Land decay, due to unsustainable farming through ever increasing levels of pesticides and fertilizers, mining, city expansion and pollution threatens 40% of the population. source
  • This decay may cause migrations of upwards of 50 million people by 2050 source
  • We’re currently experiencing what is know as a nutrient collapse in our foods. We’re able to make more and more using fertilizers and genetic modification (which I’m not against) but this food is less and less nutritious. All nutrients, from protein to calcium to vitamins, have dropped significantly since 1950. Not because of over fertilization but because of the changes in the atmosphere since the industrial revolution. More CO2 in the air means plants grow faster, storing more glucose instead of the nutrients we desire. Scientists are alarmed and uncertain as to how this will play out in the longterm. source
  • Half of all animal life on planet Earth has died in the past forty years. source

Marine litter. Anthropocene layer of plastic.

These are just a few points. It’s difficult to list them all, as it seems everyday things get worse. As a general statement, there is enough evidence to argue that the natural foundation of society is at risk and that the environment is collapsing. This is directly tied to the social relations of production. That is, capitalism. It requires constant growth to maintain profit. It is a sociopathic system. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, capitalism has been at the center of environmental collapse.

Unless capitalism is destroyed through world revolution, the environment, and therefore all life, will face extinction.

Image1, Image2

Article #2:Plastic As Fecal Matter
Article #3:Land Submergence
Article #4:Humanity As Devil

Sort:  

There is only so much land, and so little resources. We will run out eventually and leave the world as a desert. We need to look to the stars or find a more sustainable way to manage human existence.

I agree but we shouldn't have to do it. Like, humans destroyed what the universe gave us the first time. This place could be paradise. I don't want our insanity to spread itself in the universe. We have to evolve beyond what we currently are.

Also, I'm skeptical of Elon Musk and the billionaire space cadets. Like, they'll just bring their own sociopathic ideology into space. And they sure as fuck don't care about the rest of us. They're just concerned in saving their own asses.

@dirge does not worry, people will not take that madness anywhere, simple in space, the ghost is pathetic and no one will allow us to take out the madness of another planet.
The truth is that man is the discoverer, the bad thing is that our civilization is far from space, and to become one, we must all change our way of thinking.
Greetings

Very interesting.
For the first time, I see a person having understood the first source of the problems in the case of capitalism, pollution, and so on. and at the same time there is nothing against gene-modified foods.
I think you need to know a little more about this.
I guess you're a young man and thinking about changing the rotten system and seeing mistakes is very good, but read more about the things you write and think.
Inform yourself and think!
Greetings

Hi. Thanks for reading.
Although I'm always happy to learn more, I know plenty about this to defend my statements. I read plenty. I'm not young. I'm not just coming around to things.

There's a lot of wonderful potential in using genetic modification. And in fact, nature itself modifies genes everyday. Evolution, through natural selection, is a modification to the gene pool. Human's have selectively breed plants and animals for tens of thousands of years, perhaps even longer. For example, cabbage, broccoli, kale and cauliflower all come from the same plant. Humans 'modified' the genetics to get what we have today. source

I'm not a Luddite. Technology can be great. The problem is how it is used, by who, for what purpose. In the case we're seeing now, genetically modified foods perform a function for corporations. Mainly, to monopolize the food supply, both to seize profit off our daily necessity to consume food for survival, as well as controlling the working class. But that doesn't mean all genetic modification is 'bad'.

That's exactly how genetically modified foods serve the corporations, but because we really do not need it, they are working on this issue to create an artificial need for these foods.
As for new technologies, most people are not afraid of the exact opposite, but they are always used for a bad purpose.
And for the selection for thousands of years and that's right there is nothing wrong with that, but each selected food is 100% natural.
And to be objective, let's not forget the gluten problem that we have last years of these selections over the years, and what the consequences of genetically modified nobody is saying because they do not like it, for now it's only clear that if we eat these foods after two generations we will be sterile.
Greetings.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.14
JST 0.029
BTC 64689.27
ETH 3135.60
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.56