Critiquing Basics for Writers and Readers

in writing •  2 years ago

It's common for people new to peer review, new to acting as a crit partner, or new to writing to feel insecure about their ability to provide feedback.

We’re used to thinking about how much writers puts themselves out there when they submit for critique, but the truth is that critters puts themselves out there just as much when they make an honest comment in a critique. We dread making fools of ourselves. We fear we are wrong when others have read before us and didn’t flag that a sentence confused them or a scene felt off. We bare our souls when we crit as well as when we write.

I have one simple line to remember here.

If you can read and you can think, you can crit productively.

The grammar stuff--that’s the trivial part of critting. People can edit grammar without understanding the content at all. So quit fretting if you don’t feel comfortable with that part. Just focus on the content instead.

Basic Rules of Being a Good Critter

  1. Be honest. Don’t say something is wonderful if it isn’t. That doesn’t help anyone.
  2. Be polite. If you’re a writer, you know how it feels to be on the other side. Try to be careful with your wording. Not to the point of packing things up in bubble wrap, but don’t be mean about it. Don’t say the whole thing sucks. Say “This story didn’t work for me,” and, as best you can, a few points why it doesn’t work.
  3. Try to point out something positive, even if small. This is something I am not overly good at doing myself. I tend to get so lost in the story that I forget to point out that you’re doing a very good job at suspending my disbelief, or your characters are amazing, or whatever else wonderful things you are doing. But as a writer myself, I know how much those few words of praise can counteract the sting of having some words you’d agonized over cut.
  4. If you aren’t sure about something, it’s okay to say that. You can put a comment at the end of the piece that says you read it but you aren’t sure how you feel about it. Or that you don’t have anything to add beyond other comments. You can highlight a sentence that doesn’t feel right even if you don’t know what’s wrong with it. One of my go-to explanations is “awkward.”
  5. Trust your gut. If you do much reading and thinking about what you read, you have a certain instinct or gut sense about things. Trust that and develop it. So if your gut is saying something is wrong here, flag it. Explain what is bothering you the best you can.
  6. You’re allowed to contradict the “big guns.” Much of reading is down to taste. Maybe you are closer to the target audience of the piece than this “big gun” you are afraid to contradict. Maybe they’re wrong (collective gasps of dismay). Or maybe you are thinking, “Since @bex-dk already read this piece and didn’t flag this, it must be fine.” Well, maybe I was having a bad day and missed it. Maybe I had read an earlier draft that you didn’t, so had a picture in my head left-over and your fresh eyes have caught a very important detail. So flag it!

But What Should I Look For?

When you get right down to it, all critting is based on reader reactions. So go through it as a reader. Here are examples of some of the points you can consider:

  • Can you get into the story? Is the author able to suspend your disbelief so you aren’t constantly thinking things are ridiculous?
  • Is the author consistent with the world, characters, plot, etc.? Anything that feels contradictory to something elsewhere you should mark.
  • Does the story or a character speak to you? Are you feeling a connection to something?
  • Does an individual line/paragraph/scene add to or detract from the story? Maybe there’s a part that you just don’t understand why it’s needed. Or maybe you were really into the flow, but then something interrupted you.
  • How is the pacing and flow of the story? Does it go too fast, does it drag, or maybe there are speed bumps?
  • Do you think you understand what the writer means or are you quite simply left confused?

If you don't yet have a peer review group to work with you, I strongly recommend checking out the community I call home, @ink-ubator.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Reading this before submitting a story for consideration, to the #fictionworkshop. This article certainly gives one an idea of what you will be looking for while critiquing. This gives the "critique-y" a sneak preview. Very helpful! Thank you @bex-dk! Now on to the Submissions article. :)

Wonderful article! Thank you so much for writing this, @bex-dk.

A very helpful article for writers, readers, and those wishing to assist with critiques. Thank you.

Smiling. Bex is a great critter! She sees everything. Thanks Bex.


Not everything. But apparently I have an eye for characters who refuse to die. ;-)

Perfect timing with this post @bex-dk! Reading this, I feel I'm applying quite a few of your suggestions while judging the #marveloustales contest. I feel I can still zoom in on a few details though, so your pointers really help me along :-)

Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by bex-dk from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, and someguy123. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows and creating a social network. Please find us in the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.

If you like what we're doing please upvote this comment so we can continue to build the community account that's supporting all members.

This post has received a 0.28 % upvote from @drotto thanks to: @banjo.