I still don't like the fact that the content creators lose another 10% while the company simply continues to cash in left and right. It seems highly unfair and exactly the systems everyone is promoting that steemit is fighting against such as Facebook. It literally makes no sense why we as a community of users can't restrict their spending and their rewards they are getting for such little work and such flat out in my opinion disrespect to all the members on steemit.
If we want to truly fix something then that is what needs to be fixed.
The 50.50 split is such as simple yet effective solution. Palnet did this and now I curate 100% more then what I ever did on steemit. I actually read posts and vote on them and include my own detailed comment after it. To me it has already built a closer and better community and it was such a small/smart and simple change.
Will do my best to be on the radio show tonight been looking forward to listening to one.
They don't lose 10%, and it seems you have no problem with curation cutting entirely into author rewards more than twice that since you can cash in on that, plus this has absolutely nothing to do with Facebook and how in the world would you restrict their spending, since when is crypto at all about limiting how much others can spend and where do you get off thinking that a mob, what you refer to as "community" has any right to impose your arbitrary limits and finally how do you figure that the SPS has anything to do with steemit selling their coins?
The nerve some people have.
Never said sps was part of steemits spending. U can't sit there and think that steemit the company has not been dragging down prices with their massive sells each month. The market cap is only a few million on steem so it plays a huge factor. They have acomphished near nothing with the money they have blown. If u say they haven't then u must be missing a few screws.
Posted using Partiko Android
Here you are, in the ultimate wisdom of "but there must be something we can do to limit how much users can sell".
I'm the one missing screws though, and because you don't know how much work they are doing that means that they're not doing work. Keep on talking shit about steemit, it's the most popular thing to do, literally as original as harping on ze whalez.
As if I said anything to that effect. This is what you said:
And I said:
Because you tied one into the other, implicating that one has something to do with the other.
!dramatoken
this is one of the most thoughtful comments I've gotten in a year or so!
At least at this rate it won't be too long until that stake's sold off - or maybe I should be careful what I wish for?!?
That comment's worth a !dramatoken !
has to be on it's own line.
I tossed it out there for you. :)
Oh OK thanks! Next time!
Posted using Partiko Android
Yeah, I'm sure you think that makes sense, after all it's high season to say idiotic nonsense and feel entitled to how much others can spend.
Please share your wonderful wisdom then lol
Posted using Partiko Android
Here's something, the absence of visible development is not necessarily even the indication of such an absence. It's my spin on "the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence". If you couldn't decypher the other one: it does not matter if one person tries to censor others from selling their coins, or a whole "community", it's not the right thing, and the means never justify the ends.
Posted using Partiko Android
Well I am not saying restrictions be put on their funds. That I agree is not right. But just like with any investment such as stocks u have a vote. With dpos u don't. It's more of a government structure and we know how much money governments love to blow.
Posted using Partiko Android
Literally what you expressed, go find you a screwdriver or something that can tune up those things you call brains.
(I'm all three dudes right now)
Really puzzles me how u go through life with such the aditude lol good luck with that enjoy your weekend.
Posted using Partiko Android
Yeah but you're probably as puzzled by that as in thinking with what you were going to do to evade exactly what you said just now when you tried to make it as if my attitude was what we were discussing. In other words, project much "my shit don't stink"?
Nah just a Miss understanding on ur part which is very common online. Restricting them would mean reduced funds the company earns because the community voted on it as a change. Steems price will struggle if there is needless spending and the community should be able to vote more and have direction.
Steemit is steem they are suppose to do the development work. They haven't been and still lack to make much movement. They spend time on dumb updates instead of listening to the community as they should since each person here is in essence a stock holder in the company.
But I can see from ur other posts u just like to bitch and moan so after this post u will no longer be a waste of my time.
Posted using Partiko Android
Such drama, you've earned a DRAMA!
To view or trade
DRAMAgo to steem-engine.com.