You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Witness Update - Acknowledgement of error and changes to @curie witness operation structure (April 2nd, 2018)
Yes, agree with what you are saying here 100%. As part of the Curie community I can tell you that we all felt a timely response was important; and while it is unfortunate this happened in the first place, we have much more robust monitoring and QA protocols in place now.
The 4 eyes process is a really smart and simple idea that I think we'll borrow from you in the future as well.
One of the benefits of being a community witness is that you pretty much always have someone around to check any changes that you are making. A lot of the time, the changes don't need to be too technical anyway, and even if they are, in the face of having to explain them to someone non-technical, you will often pick up something that you missed.