Symbiont{s} | Steem Sentinels | Rewards Regulation Tool

in #witness-category3 months ago

SYMBIONT TEMPLATE update 2.png

Thriving Through a Symbiotic Equilibrium

Steem Sentinels | Rewards Regulation Tool

Greetings,

   Some of you may already know that we launched a community-led anti-abuse project months ago, but we must admit that its effectiveness is very low because we did not receive the support we hoped for from Steemit. Inc. We have also followed the main announcement with more articles you can find here and here to request more support and discuss the topic of anti-abuse in more detail.

  Although we did not receive support, this does not mean that the community can not do something about abuse. The concept of negative-voting as defined in the whitepaper is something that should be done by all stakeholders that have an interest in keeping the Steem ecosystem clean and secure. It is the idea that everyone can play a role in fighting abuse regardless of the amount of SP:(1)

Through the addition of negative-voting it is possible for many smaller stakeholders to nullify the voting power of collusive groups or defecting large stakeholders. Furthermore, large-stakeholders have more to lose if the currency falls in value due to abuse than they might gain by voting for themselves. In fact, honest large stakeholders are likely to be more effective by policing abuse and using negative voting than they would be by voting for smaller contributions.

   Unfortunately, such a concept can only work efficiently if there a huge distribution of power on Steem which is not the case. In the current situation, antiabuse projects need support from large stakeholders on Steem to have any noticeable effect even though we really do not like the idea. We should as a community avoid conglomeration-like projects where only 1 person is responsible for fighting abuse and deciding which one is going to be sent to the void. We favor the idea of community-lead projects because we believe that without accountability and the ability for people to directly reach out and discuss cases of abuse, we will be no better than former projects that used fighting abuse as a way to pander and attract more political support and financially profit from it by the biases of influential connections.

   In addition to that, fighting abuse should not be the main goal here, because it is impossible to 100% clean the chain from abuse, it is time-consuming and a tedious thing to do if you want to do it without being totalitarian. Some might see it as a battlefield, where everyone is against everyone, it is a harsh truth about Steem but yet others might think that this is really normal since what really matters is that the blockchain is properly working, blocks are produced, and the STEEM distributed. A PoW with PoB as a bonus. In this context, we can find in the whitepaper that:(2)

Eliminating “abuse” is not possible and shouldn’t be the goal. Even those who are attempting to “abuse” the system are still doing work. Any compensation they get for their successful attempts at abuse or collusion is at least as valuable for the purpose of distributing the currency as the make-work system employed by traditional Bitcoin mining or the collusive mining done via mining pools. All that is necessary is to ensure that abuse isn’t so rampant that it undermines the incentive to do real work in support of the community and its currency.

   As we have said several times before, we like to inform the community about the reality of things in order for everyone to have a realistic view of the situation, everyone should be aware of what to expect. Justice on Steem can not be achieved since the mechanism of distribution highly depends on PoB. Even more, achieving justice on Steem will mean that Steem failed as a blockchain. The reasoning behind this is that to achieve mass adoption we need to accept the idea that using PoB means that there will eventually be natural conflicts that will arise because of cultural differences and many other things. If anyone is willing to help in fighting abuse, he needs to take this into consideration. We are hoping for changes in the future to completely secure the first layer of the chain from the PoB problem, one can say that it is not a problem since as stated in the white paper, but there is a reality that toxicity and bad publicity can do more harm and prevent mass adoption.

   We still believe that the Steem ecosystem needs a decent and presentable project to deal with cybercrime on the chain and cooperate with outer actors. In the meantime, we are dedicated to providing tools for people to use and take part in making Steem great and a fertile ground for projects and businesses.

Untitled (5).png

https://steemsentinels.com

   Initially, we thought we would fight cybercrime on Steem using only a bot that we developed, but such a solution is more suited to projects that have a lot of support. We are certainly still doing our best, but we have decided to provide Steem Sentinels, a tool that allows all users to participate in the regulation of rewards distribution. The tool is open-source and based on a project that was financed before by SPS (Steem Proposals). Another reason why we will only support open-source projects to receive funding from SPS. We did not have to start from scratch, and our lead dev made sure to do the proper tweaking to enhance user experience and the stability of the tool. As for now, users can only log in by using Steemlogin.

Screenshot_5.png

What can I do on SteemSentinels.com?

  1. You can trail the downvotes of a specific account and thus downvote any content they downvote at a given rate relative to the size of their downvote. (We invite people to follow @sentinels)
  2. You can counteract upvotes from specified accounts, meaning that you will downvote anything that they choose to upvote at a given rate relative to their upvote.
  3. You can counteract downvotes from specified accounts, meaning that you will upvote anything that they choose to downvote at a given rate relative to their downvote.
  4. You can define a counter downvotes author blacklist, you won't counter the downvotes if the receiver of the vote is in this list.
  5. You can define a whitelist that contains all users that you will not downvote regardless of the other parameters.
  6. You can define a hit list that allows you to downvote a user using X% whenever his post or comment reaches more than Y$ (e.g: downvote x account if his post received more than Y dollars).
  7. You can allow the tool to use your Steem Power to downvote if your downvote Power is depleted.
  8. You can decide to halt downvote operations if your SP or DVP is above X%.

Screenshot_6.png

   We have already spent quite some time testing and tweaking the tool. All the functions are 100% operational. However, we are open to feedback from the community. We invite anyone who discovered a bug or facing a problem to directly reach out to us on Discord or send us an email ([email protected]). We are also open to suggestions on how we can improve the tool.

   In the end, we must thank everyone who is supporting us, and everyone who is doing his best to keep the Steem blockchain safe, secure, and vibrant.



Stay tuned, even more things are coming!

Steem on,

The Symbionts Team,

Referances:

(1) Steem whitepaper. 2017. Page, 14.
(2) Steem whitepaper. 2017. Page, 15.

***

Foo

Sort:  

Hello @symbionts, actually I would support you (more than voting for your witness) under different conditions. The problem is: abuse has been discussed many times (also by myself), and to change anything it would be necessary that the biggest accounts - the only ones who would be able to fight abuse by users like @goulash - were ready to join!
As obviously that is not their aim, I decided to get my part of the cake, too, and besides many votes supporting other users, a certain part of my votes will be reserved for my wife @kobold-djawa. That's just being honest, at least she makes great posts. Of course it's your right to flag her, no problem.

In case in future there will be a common sense on this platform that fighting abuse is an important aim (which I would really appreciate!) I am ready to change my voting behaviour immediately.

Hi, @jaki01,

Fighting abuse on the Steem blockchain is conceptually similar to attrition warfare in military strategy, which consists of "wearing down the enemy to the point of collapse through continuous losses in personnel and material ... the war will usually be won by the side with greater such resources".(1) Unfortunately, we do not have such resources, we have hoped for more support from Steemit Inc (mainly due to retaliation immunity), to have a public structure and even an insurance/compensation policy for collateral hits. But we are surely not there yet.

In another part, we can understand as you can see with our article above if people are not really interested in fighting abuse for fear of retaliation. More to this, we can also understand that investors who are already at a loss compared to their initial investment are not interested in lowering their ROI just for the sake of it, while others are doing what they can to extract value from the chain.

I decided to get my part of the cake

We like to treat situations with a realistic approach and see things as they really are, we will not be lying if we say that we understand the reasoning behind what you said above. But, of course, consensus does not always pair with morality, and trying to take a share of the cake can is many situations prompt people to ask themselves if this is a good thing to do? or is this the right way? whether if the consensus is broken (reached) or not.

It is apparent at this point that there is still not enough political will to tackle the abuse issue. We are doing what we can with what we have despite a huge lack of support. It is up to the community now to ask for more serious measures from the large players on the chain. Accepting the status quo and give in to an anarchic path is definitely not something that we support nor should anyone else, for such anarchic behaviors as we have seen before are mostly practiced by people who wish harm to the Steem blockchain.

Thank you for passing by @jaki01.

ـــــــــ
(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attrition_warfare

Attrition warfare
Attrition warfare is a military strategy consisting of belligerent attempts to win a war by wearing down the enemy to the point of collapse through continuous losses in personnel and material. The war will usually be won by the side with greater such resources. The word attrition comes from the Latin root atterere to rub against, similar to the "grinding down" of the opponent's forces in attrition warfare.

So you flagged me for abuse? Please explain this abuse?

DVs removed. We were countering a specific account that is using other accounts as bait for DVs. Thank you for letting us know.

Looks like I was caught in the same net. I don't know why you (and your trail) attacked me. I'm barely ever able to scrape up a cent here (I'm still down about 80% despite 3 years of nonstop high quality original content)... so when I finally get a post that's going to pay out, and it gets attacked by "anti abuse" accounts, it doesn't sit right.

DVs removed. Thank you for reaching out @drutter.

These anti abuse people are flagging post cause they don't like who voted it

Well I don't agree with this anti abuse BS. when your downvoting for personal reasons. This is why no one supports these groups your try to take control and it is not right. so fuck your downvote trail

They are continuously downvoting my all posts... I also wanna know the reasons..

Please do mind that users are free to downvote your posts simply for disagreement on rewards.

You reach out to us, we answered your question and removed the DVs.

Since you are insulting us for being responsive and cooperative, we will make sure next time to not answer your questions.

Thank you,

Anti abusers are usually the biggest abusers around just pissed of about somebody nibbling at the cake they intend to eat!

Tell me the reason for downvoting my all videos?? I am a daily vlogger of Dtube and steem platform... May I ask you, the reason for downvotes? Will you stop these continuous downvotes without any reason?

Thank you for your service. We will consider joining this trail.

As a justification for your actions you claim that rewards given to quality content creators increases value of steem while rewards given to people using shall we call it creative voting or vote harvesting decrease the value of steem somehow.
I completely disagree it's not like anybody buys steem to be able to read an article here value of steem is decided by free market demand and it's the "harvesters" that are the people who usually buy in and need to hold on to their steem to achieve the desired return from their investment so really it's people like yourself who are fucking it up for everybody by driving down the overall demand for steem

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.03
JST 0.038
BTC 10439.16
ETH 342.31
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.95