You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: PROPOSAL: REDUCE POWERDOWN FROM 13 WEEKS to 5 WEEKS.
The issue is that it will hit the long-term success rate of the platform. We will need always to attract and keep incentivizing new users for this place to have any value. But with this scheme, that possibility is really jeopardized :(
You mean the 50/50 curation/author rewards right? You are happy with the shorter vesting period?
Yep, 50/50 author-curator rate.
Before lowering the vesting period, I would love to see a mechanism that readily allows witnesses to rollback any change if there is proof that the said change is not helping the system.
I like the vesting period as it is because it prevents big stakeholders to participate in a pup&dump dynamic.
But again, this should be safely tested and we should have a mechanism to return to the previous state with no delays.
That is a simple economic parameter, don’t even think it requires much coding, u can def. roll back from that.