Much appreciated @pfunk, you are the one of my favourite witness.

Price feeds don't need to be too frequent. .....

I have a different view on this. And probably this perspective is what I think bothers the top witnesses.

I agree that systemically it does not make a big difference. But eventually it degrades the professionalism of Steem witnesses. We should not expect the Investors and competitors understand this system as much.

Price feed is very simple and nearly cost nothing. I would be still quite disappointed if any top or standby witnesses are not managing one of their very basic duty. Broken window theory fits here. I respect your view of the feed though.

Thanks about the versions. I didn't know that clearly and learned now. I will reuse my reply to @timcliff

Thanks for pointing out the version tag. I was unaware of it. However I still think staying in 0.19.2 is not the best no matter what patch is applied under the bonnet because what the people outside of the circle think is also quite important. You know what I mean. I naively hope someone like you could make a voice about it.

Also, no other people can prove the witness has 0.19.2 without the security hole. Should we just trust? I would say no. You know and I know that upgrading from 0.19.2 to 0.19.3 is super easy. Don't even need to replay as I recall. I don't think it is asking too much for top witnesses to spend some time to make it look better for everyone.

I am not a business man, consultant, manager or something similar. I am just an engineer. Even someone like me can see something unprofessional. How would that look to the others is the question.

@pfunk, I believe you would not regard me as a troublemaker, and hopefully other witnesses would not as well. Many thanks for your reply.