You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Writing course / Curso de escritura #wewrite
Hola @inspiracion, la imagen 2 es generada con IA, esto es un inconveniente.
Saludos.
Hola @inspiracion, la imagen 2 es generada con IA, esto es un inconveniente.
Saludos.
Hola amigo, como puedes revisar en el link abajo de la imagen, la fuente es Pixabay, muchas imágenes en los bancos de imágenes usan IA para editar las fotos, no estamos tomando ninguna ventaja al usar esta imagen de este banco de imágenes como es Pixabay, así que no lo veo como un problema en este caso.
Saludos.
¡Hola! Muchas gracias por la aclaratoria.
¡Feliz día!
Gracias a ti, igualmente feliz día 😊
AI is no problem IF it is not generated by YOU. Haha.
Your answer is very interesting.🙂
I guess what you said above is more interesting. 😃😃😃 I have nothing against the use of AI-generated images, I have seen a lot of posts using AI-generated images. Some wrote interesting short stories and visualized them using AI-generated images. Some use these kind of images to showcase the use of them. But I myself until this time cannot see me using AI-generated images in my articles, I don't know in the future maybe. I enjoy making the images for my articles myself.
The problem with AI as such is the use given to it, like any tool, it can corrupt good work if it is not used appropriately.
In my articles I have not used images generated by AI either, in this case this article is the product of team work. And I am a person open to ideas. When I have doubts, what I do is use my own common sense and review the principles of Steemit: In this case we are not avoiding the proof of brain, nor are we taking any advantage over others. We simply used an image that could be any from pixabay, even a cartoon or a painting... without the negative connotation that it was produced by an AI.
AI is not something "bad in itself", I repeat, it depends on the use that is given to it, and in Steemit that has been made very clear: It should not be used to generate content and assume (or be assumed) that we did it ourselves...
The problem with AI as such is the use given to it, like any tool, it can corrupt good work if it is not used appropriately.
That can be right. I agree with you to some point.
I know you wouldn't use any AI-generated images to generate profits on Steem.
Tell me, is it REALLY that AI-generated images are forbidden on Steem (except for the use like you wrote in the last paragraph)? I can understand the principle if it is so: STEEM WANTS ORIGINALITY.
But I can tell you I have seen some articles that contain these kinds of images got big rewards and upvoted by the accounts which I think should go against them. When I find one, maybe I will show you, or maybe not.
This is interesting.
You are also right, to a certain extent.
Images that are not your own, that is, that are taken from an image bank, are not an original production of the author of the post.. Everything that is there comes in here, including the images generated by AI.
I usually tell content creators that original content, which also includes photographs, is more representative of themselves. Content creators should know this and I think they know it.
So, the question is that not only are the images generated by AI not original, we must know and we are aware that neither are those taken from image banks...
If we delve deeper into the concept of originality, a photograph from an image bank could be an original production, but it does not belong to you. You borrow it and you must mention it.
The image that is created by AI, who belongs to it? to the AI... I guess. And it is not your creation either, and you should mention it.
That's how I understand it...
I Agree with you,,, in almost everything you type above.