Cliff all your work is based on the unproven theory that we're all psychic. What if you're wrong and your webbots just capture and aggregate the state of mind and sentiments of the world coming from a more menial source like social conditioning, media influence, literacy, etc? Which is much more plausible... what then? As a computer scientist I've created crawlers and aggregated big data for ages... what if your main premise is wrong or impossible to be proven? I've seen crawlers predict the nikkei and big data showing how posts in social media can influence uprisings or depression... you know nothing psychic... if we boil ourselves to the scientific method what proof do you have of anything you say?
About stars (And all cosmology then), heavy elements in the universe, aliens, metals from thin air... beyond reading big data and forecasting from it like a lot of people do, what concrete scientifically viable and provable data can you provide?