Wonderful method of evaluating merit in this country is strange
[There are a few my own personal questions asked in writing. At the beginning, I think 100 percent may not be correct. The examples that have been drawn are simply examples. I'm not privy to any person or organization privately After the publication of the article many people started commenting in the language without understanding the theme's theme and speech. After finishing their confusion, I would explain a number of points, numbers 1,2 and 4. Those explanations were later linked to the original writing.]
One;
I passed a college under one of the Uncle National Universities and then passed a degree and then passed MA. It may be possible to double the degree. After a long time the teachers' job in a private college village can not be collected in the capital for a long time. Eventually the college was officially elected. Today 12 years later, three principal and one first officer of the college. Most of the republicans of the republic are in social status. Has his signature and seal authority. He will get a pension, break a limb, or sit on somebody's feet, stay on holiday for a long time, get salaries, and receive bonuses in the festival. The government will make him a donkey for him. Even if he divides the next wife, the government's permission will be required to file a lawsuit against him. In total, being a graduate in two attempts from college and a small private sector job in Dhaka can not be done in the garden, the person is the first class citizen today. Homework in the society - not to change its talent, Reflect on the official government system. I am a non-governmental employee in the life of integrity and hard work by mastering the first class from Dhaka University. The bus helper does not even grow. The state may have been a fourth grade citizen. So why is this policy unjustified by the government and its rightful citizens, and suddenly, why is the policy of rising back on someone's forehead? When a private education institute is made public, then what is the procedure for evaluating whether its existing staff are equally qualified as existing government teachers? Or does the government mean its default by all its traditional staff and teacher official teacher means the first class? If the evaluation system is the education? What is the method of evaluating whether its existing staff is equal to the existing government teachers? Or does the government mean its default by all its traditional staff and teacher official teacher means the first class? If the evaluation system is the education?
Explanation:
My question is, someone took a teaching in a private college after being unable to qualify for all the classes. There he fits. Good read But suddenly the college was official. He became the first class officer of the government system, because he did not qualify for this government. My objection is here Another BCS graduate passed the same college with the lecturer. So when his colleagues sit like him without the BCS, it is not an underestimation of merit? Despite having dropped twice, I have no area because of getting her first-class citizen or government job. You misunderstand. The truth is that he did not take any job in all the fields (educational institutions and jobs), and took a job as a teacher in a private college. How would the job be done in the village college 12 years ago, Hope you know So once the college was a fortunate government, the gentleman became the official teacher by default. After that, he became a flower professor in the rules of government college. My objection is here If he was a government official after being a college official and proved himself to be a government professor, I had no objection. But he got a government job, Professor is just the official system's neck My objection is not his professor, he is a lucky, official professor.
Two;
Think of English literature. It is very difficult and diligent to get good results in English. Masters of the same subjects from another college of another national university. Another Normal degree passed in 3 years. (Two of my readers have given me a misconception in this section, I do not want to have a Bachelor's degree in BCS, but I did not edit the original post in honor of their corrections. .) Both of them gave the BCS. Qualify. The same cadre found the job. Everyone is happy But I can not be happy. Make the best results from the highest university of the country, in a difficult and industrious way. Any other person or college has passed a 3-year BA in an easy way in the college-both of them have the same qualification as the minimum qualification for the state. If I can not write in writing and my brother in the same way, However, there is no separate value for the first class of Dhaka University, against BA candidate. It is also the price of Normal BA passed, my 5 year master's of Dhaka University. He is also the point, I too Wow, the price of education?
Explanation:
You have seen, the name of a university that I have said and I have said, the name is simply used as an example. No special university is the best source of knowledge, not the best. His students are not mandatory by the countrymen. The traditional custom of the country is that, in the universities like Dhaka University, BUET, RUET, NSU, the average meritorious students of the country were admitted. There are exceptions. But on the slightest exception, the state does not leave. The state has an average rule. In two numbers, I mean, a man has graduated from any of the best and quality universities which is quite difficult, difficult and meritorious. Any other non-affiliated college (Suppose the village, where he examined the fake or book in the equation, he took a very normal BA pass course or passed it without duplication, the visible talent of these two candidates (as the order of merit in the country is determined in general (Nazrul, Apart from Robi Thakur), the first candidate is much more meritorious than the second. Whereas both of them are equal in merit point / minimum qualification for application in BCS and any government job. The first person does not get any separate points. The merit of his best university and the qualification of the candidates who have passed in any of the Tenantune courses are definitely not the same. But they are equal in the BCS or any government application. If the first one is not better than the other person in RETAIN and siblings, then he is free. The second person who was less than the first person in any trial in the first place, and the first qualifying point and the final score will be the same price at the academic result. The first does not get the slightest priority or more points. So, what is the value of education earned by his lifetime, compared to his opponent third grade candidates? My objection is there You can say, in siblings, In the case of the choice, the testers will pretend that first. That is also an injustice. Why do they just give a preference to the name of the university.
Three;
There are some systems for promoting top positions in public universities and in the field of medical profession. After getting started with the lecturer, after getting started with some specific research, publication, lecture hour, visits and many other narmes, he will gradually arrange an assistant, then the associate and later professor promotion. As far as the doctors know, the arrangements for top senior positions, along with the acquisition of a number of such works like FCPS, FRCS, similar research, publication, practice hour. Now Conceptual Professors, doctors are our very respected (the highest honor in my opinion) position professionals. They have to be evaluated in such a complex and difficult way and then qualify to be senior. In the government administration, who are the first class or second class poster, do they get any promotions to the top rank? Or just the only qualification to cross the year - I do not know. However, My goal is just teachers Professors. If he is a lecturer in a government college, he has to take any of the tests, publication, lecture hour, visits, and any other skills to get a job? I do not know. The job is only for a particular year. Then, the most meritorious teachers of the public university have to become professors with tough tests, and if the college teachers can pass the year, they will become professors - that is, the Ultimate Achievement will be the same, stay in the same status, what kind of justice? We did not have the system of merit evaluation. The most meritorious teachers of the public university have to be professors with tough tests, and if the college teachers can pass the year, they will become professors - that is, the Ultimate Achievement will be equal, will be in the same status, what kind of justice? We did not have the system of merit evaluation. The most meritorious teachers of the public university have to be professors with tough tests, and if the college teachers can pass the year, they will become professors - that is, the Ultimate Achievement will be equal, will be in the same status, what kind of justice? We did not have the system of merit evaluation.
Four;
All of us know, the higher education of public universities is almost free. It means almost lioness subsided. The state has graduated and mastered students in hundreds of subjects by subscribing to the university from its own responsibility and need (to create high quality citizens and workers for the state). Objectives Creating a wise and capable person in different subjects. It may be biomedicals to be literary. So, it is worth the effort, the state's very valuable money which is earned by the taxation of the poor people, when it is so patently spent, its purpose is to give expert gifts to the subjects and subjects in the overall welfare of the state. But a large percentage of the talents generated in this cost and labor, wait for years to give interviews in the BCS and other government jobs. The aim is to create a government job. They get very little number of them. So who gets the drink, About 99% of them do not enter their subject related to any subject. It can be seen, biomechanical engineer, he entered the service to customs. Again the students of BBA. He entered the service in the police. So, for the last 5 years, the state has invested money to teach BBA, behind it, what is the assessment? Does the state itself do not arrange its money to undermine its talent and talent?
Explanation:
I certainly agree about Humayun or Newton. Anyone can grow up to anywhere. Like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates. But we call those few exceptions but exceptions. Overall, we rely on conventional rules. That is Ratings, Grading, Testing, Marx. Now you say, can we find the talent like Steve Jobs and run the country? Living like a big system? Or, will I put an average general system, those systems that will come out as talented, take them to work? There are certainly billions of bill gates across the country. Now, do we find out that Bill Gates has a hidden intellectual capacity and is evaluating the true merit - can I take the title with the title? Does a huge state system work like that? No one is a master of specific subject matter to sign in to anything. Yes, if he is a reliever, he will do well in that regard, It is the world's average or general style. The rest of the example is, the exception is It is not possible to determine state systems or customs depending on the exceptions. Still, I'm not saying, if you fall into the subject subject to a particular subject, then if you do not get the subject related to the subject, then there will be enough education to go to the country's great loss or specific job. What I want to know is that, in a country, 15 subjects or topics are held in the country and graduation and mastering is done in all the universities. That means, the country thinks that those 15 people who are studying in the subjects need different sectors of their country. With that goal, he started the university with the huge amount of money for the creation of the Graduate in 15 subjects. Now, if there is a system in the country, anyone who gets the opportunity to study, and that opportunity will use it, "just to get the minimum qualification for a job, that is to graduate at public cost, And somehow, after graduation, to go into any job, but why the state does not subsidize a large amount of money behind this education, the whole country does not have a single subject called "BCS". Why is he teaching history, psychology, pali, Sanskrit, Bangla, Islamic studies, peace and conflict - this obsolete and non-related subjects? I'm convinced, if a physician's student gets the opportunity, then he can be a good policeman, but why is he teaching him physics? Physics related job if the state can not prepare for it, why teach him physics? He will go out and send remittance to the foreign university or a private office for the country - for that? Generally earn money? I do not blame those who are reading and taking other jobs. They are unable. But why the state is not its job, the subject which he can not use,