You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: How an Airborne Ranger Became a Voluntaryist
Let me make clear the meaning of “Governments must cloak their actions in an aura of moral legitimacy in order to sustain their power.” It uses the term “aura of moral legitimacy.” By “aura,” think “appearance.” No street gang has moral legitimacy. No group of people labeling themselves “government” have any moral legitimacy, only an appearance/ a con artist approach to fool the sheep. I suspect now you are in 100% alignment with the voluntaryist statement of principles.
So there is no Legitimate Government? No Uniform Due Process?
Correct. That is the conclusion. The premise is the constitution grants government its authority. To check that premise, please read the essay “No Treason: The Constitution of no Authority,” by Lysander Spooner.
The premise is that people Judge people and people need to fill the positions to bring others before the justice of a court in front of a jury of their peers, under a signed affidavit attesting to the injuries of the one signing.
You did not read the essay. Nor did you address the true/false of the premise how government Is supposed to get it’s authority (moral legitimacy). That is the only premise required to prove whether the conclusion is true or false. Modus ponens or modus tonens.
Let me break down what Lysander is ignorant to. Legitimate government stems from the Treaties that are not contracts of governmental services or have any semblance to them because Treaties such as the Definitive Treaty of Peace are our establishment of truths, and their precedence is in the blood and guts spilt to assert them. When I said, "the premise is that People Judge people and people.." I was talking about our Legitimate Government and not the Constitution which is a Framework for the 19 services that our States Contracted through. Our legitimate government is American Common Law Republic, or By and For The Public, not by and for the Majority. People are supposed to take care of their State Government and their Local Government in this way, where the people hold the authority in LAW (Reason/Logic and Definition) and the Government is their Good Faith Servant. The role of Master and Servant is what Lysander wants from the Federal Government even though the Federal Government is supposed to be Subservient to the State (as they hold 99.99999999% of their authority as Sovereign) and if the State is not doing their job it's because the People who are supposed to fill the state aren't doing their job, and if they aren't doing their job it's because people have let their courts be run by thieving and kidnappers and haven't brought them to justice even though they are the Justice of the land, and as Sovereign owes no ALIGIENCE to the state he/she resides in insomuch as who is the treasurer, who maintains the armory, who are keeping tabs on robbery and murder and such things are of no importance or matter to him or her. Ultimately Lysander doesn't attack the Federal for the Federal is at the mercy of the State, and he cannot attack the Statehood Compacts or the Treaties upon which they are built, nor can he attack a good faith agreement, nor can he attack the function of the Federal, or to protect our, then newly acquired, Dutch merchant fleet, the largest fleet in the world at the time. He cannot attack he root of it because the root is legitimate in expressing the immutable truths our forefathers died and lost all to defend. The American Head of State is not the president, but that position is the Counterpart that Keeps the Federal IN check.
If you want to read more about what I am talking, go to http://www.annavonreitz.com
Sovereign and Citizen are Oil and Water, you cannot be Both your Own Master AND serve another master, that is why in our Republican Government requires that one relinquishes their Aliegence to Themselves (sovereignty, independence, freedom ) and give their allegiance to the People and Serving them as State Citizen (not state National), and that is why The People then are the Master, because they decide if indeed that person (not legal fiction) is good or if they are to removed and prosecuted.
http://annavonreitz.com/justthefacts.pdf
Why stop at the state level though? Why should Richmond rule over Charlottesville within Virginia? Who made those people my rulers? Why not go further and and further all the way to the individual?
Yes, he lost me in the first sentence. An endless chain of “who appointed these people?” I didn’t sign shit. The constitution does not apply to me. It does not apply to Trump or any other presidents in the past. Or Supreme Court justices or congressmen. They are all frauds. And so at the state level too. There is no federal government and there are no state governments.
Clearly denying the Commonwealths, the numerous Statehood Compacts, and the other Treaties upon which they are built is tied into "I didn't sing shit".
The Local Rules Over the State, the State over the Federal, the Sovereign Rules over the State Citizen, who rule over their positions, whos positions keep the Federal in check. The state cannot rule over the local because it serves the Local. Nobody is a Ruler over Anyone, the American government is anarchism perfected. If Richmond rules over Charlottesville is because there is NO rule of law/Government and it's pure ANARCHY (no rules, not no RULERS-AKA Re-Public)
It doesn't work that way though, and you know it. As soon as you create that next higher level of government, power and control for it begins to concentrate and grow.
The sovereign certainly rules over everyone else only if the sovereign takes such action. Without going into details I disobey certain man made edicts the war lords claim I need to obey. I agree we live in anarchy. But we don’t have general voluntaryism. Voluntaryism must be the popular culture before we have anarchy without warlords. Certainly there is no government, only warlords. It’s my main focus to keep reducing the percentage of my wealth that they extort or steal from me. Once we have enough tax resisters to make a severe shortfall in revenue, we could get our revolution.