You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: [STATISM] An Abusive Relationship
Its hard to follow some political articles. Im the type of guy that if anyone is going to make a point in such away it would be advisable for you to give a example and give a alternative. the example can be general but the solution most be detailed or it begins to sound like propaganda. Lots of good slogans but no practical application.
This is neither slogans, nor meant to provide any solutions. It's a simple analogy to highlight the abusive nature of statism.
Yeah but I was just expected a little thoughtful guidance and I know you said you don't have a solution and im not griping with you it's more about the other people I have talked to. I need to do some more reading on anarchy in practice most definitely then I need people to give me a sign. You know "are you the joker or are you Riddick?" these fictional characters are being used to illustrate the differences in the brand of anarchy some people are preaching for.
You're asking for "an alternative" for violence. The solution is to remove violence. Nothing is going to replace it.
An alternative to the system that causes the state to motivate you by producing penalties. the violent relationship was just a allegory.
It's not "a system". It's violence. I don't care what anyone does if it's voluntary and without coercion. Freedom is the only alternative, and it comes naturally, good heavens...
Violence: behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something. That definition is wrong. I need to expand my defenition because even a society without that definition of violence would still have coercion to act like the society wants you to act. I mean the only way out of that cycle would be to leave society (see "Brave new world"
By Aldous Huxley).