You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Free Will Is An Illusion. This Music Video Nails It.

in #video7 years ago (edited)

I do enjoy these perspectives. However, I prefer the perspective in which free will is something like intention or the ability to choose. Sure, many or most of the choices we think we make in our day-to-day lives are actually manufactured consent, or simple routine, or otherwise predictable behavior, but the illusory nature of our options does not mean our ability to decide is itself illusory.

I guess it's the "free" part that could be considered illusory, not the "will" part.

Thanks for sharing! I'm looking forward to reading more of your writing.

Sort:  

I guess it all depends on what you mean by illusory, right? I wrote all of these articles while working for a nondual philosophy blog, so I'm happy to take the counter-perspective on this. However, Oxford philosopher Galen Strawson has a great and very easy-to-understand refutation of free will:

(1) Nothing can be causa sui - nothing can be the cause of itself. (2) In order to be truly morally responsible for one's actions one would have to be causa sui, at least in certain crucial mental respects. (3) Therefore nothing can be truly morally responsible.

http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/philosophers/strawsong/

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.12
JST 0.027
BTC 61023.73
ETH 2948.98
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.51