You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Stephen Stars As Donald Trump Jr. In 'Collusion'
Colbert is a puppet. One simple question no one is asking regarding the Trump Jr. emails... If that lawyer giving Jr. emails is a Russian government agent as reported (with zero evidence of this), then why exactly is he willing to expose Russian dealings with Clinton? Isn't that exactly the opposite of what government agents do? This story doesn't make any sense on its face.
"One simple question no one is asking... If that lawyer giving Jr. emails is a Russian government agent"
WTF are you talking about? Plenty are asking about that.
Beyond that though what this shows is that Jr. BELIEVED she was. Jr. , Kushner and Manafort were perfectly willing to collude with a foreign government. It's the intent here that is in full display.
Clinton? Who? Pathetic distraction. Let's stick to Trump you know the POTUS. But but but her emails... well now it's all about Jr's emails.
BTW those are some nice up vote bots you have there. 14 views on this article set some how 75 people managed to up vote your comment. Looks like you have some personal experience with bullshit.
"BTW those are some nice up vote bots you have there."
Thanks, I made them myself and you can do so too. Just scroll back to my earliest posts about a year ago for the source code. You can also find source code for some of the novelty response bots I created.
Well I am sure you are very proud of yourself abusing Steem with self voting bots to give yourself unearned payouts. I would rather not be another leech off of this system preventing legitimate content producers from getting payouts though, thank you.
You obviously don't understand Steem.
If I wish to vote for myself with the stake I've earned or purchased I am free to do so and by definition am a legitimate content producer earning precisely what the Steem blockchain deems appropriate.
Don't feel too bad though, understanding Steem is a difficult task. You'll figure it out one day.
So you produced Colbert's show did you? Whatever makes you feel better about it leech.
So, please do tell me where the evidence of this lawyers supposed connection to the Russian government is. In order for your argument to be true there would have to be some evidence of this right? What is a distraction? The meeting was supposedly about getting dirt on Hillary in her dealings with the Russian government. This is very much on topic. This story doesn't make any sense except to those who want it to make sense.
Are you just pretending to be stupid or are you really that dense?
He was told she was a Russian gov lawyer in the emails. Whether she was or not has no bearing on the intent being displayed. Do you know what intent is?
Beyond that plenty of reporters are digging into the lawyer's history and she appears to be a highly connected Russian at the very least.
Well, that didn't take long for you to resort to personal attacks. Care to source the supposed statement where they were told she was a "Russian government lawyer"? Intent has no bearing UNLESS A CRIME WAS COMMITTED to begin with, even if by your flimsy reasoning this did demonstrate intent. As far as being a "highly connected Russian", that is fundamentally different legally and otherwise than an official Russian government representative is it not?
If you are taking it as a personal attack then I suppose you are answering the question by admitting to be that stupid. You are either feigning ignorance or are profoundly stupid it's not an attack just a statement of fact.
Intent is not only important in a criminal sense here but also shows that the campaign team has been openly lying for months about relations with Russian nationals. It shows that they were more than willing to collude with Russians in an effort to hurt their opponent and to lie about it to the public.
It doesn't stop there though because there is also a possible criminal component. Crimes from this revelation would be campaign finance related specifically regarding accepting donations from a foreign power, even worse is Jared Kushner's role since he has now been caught repeatedly lying on his security clearance forms which is a felony on it's own.
Jr's response to being told that a Russian government lawyer wanted to help the campaign smear their opponent was "love it". One could not ask for better evidence to show intent. That is huge on it's own and we will have to wait and see what else Mueller digs up regarding the collusion and if it leads to criminal prosecution.
That's cute with the personal attack, I see what you did there. Having relations with Russian nationals is not a crime, nor was it ever the topic of question except in the media. The question was collusion with Russian government agents. You talk like there is actual evidence to support any of these accusations, but its funny, the accusations keep piling up but none of the actual evidence ever manifests. By the way... you ignored my question about your source of the "Russian government lawyer" comment.
ericarthurblair is part of a flagging gang that target anyone that disagrees with CNN please look at my blog to see the attack I suffered for talking about pizzagate.