THE LONE GUNMAN LIE

in #vegas7 years ago (edited)

by SGT, SGT report.com:

The New York Times posted this shoddy piece of "journalism" on October 4th titled 'No, There Was Not More Than One Gunman in the Las Vegas Shooting'. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/04/us/politics/fact-check-vegas-gunman.html

The article features Assistant Sheriff Todd Fasulo of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department who inexplicably made the following statement:

“I want to emphasize we believe Paddock is solely responsible for this heinous act. We are aware of the rumors outside of the media and also on social media that there was more than one assailant. We have no information or evidence to support that theory or that rumor. We believe there was only one shooter and that was Stephen Paddock.”

What you are about to see and hear will leave you asking, how can the NY Times and the Las Vegas Police and Sheriff's department even begin to make the claim that there was only one shooter at large in Las Vegas, when all of the available evidence suggests there were multiple shooters all over the city? This video debunks THE LONE GUNMAN LIE.

Thanks for tuning in.

For REAL news 24/7:
http://sgtreport.com/
http://thephaser.com/
http://thelibertymill.com/

Screen Shot 2017-07-30 at 4.50.10 PM.png

Sort:  

Thanks for posting these articles which counteract what the media tells us. Not to be rude but I will not be watching the video because I do not want to spend time trying to discover the truth or make sense out of this event.

I hate so many people died and we have prayed for their families although there really isn't a right prayer I know how to pray. I'm learning to put my focus in the areas of my life I need to improve on and spending less researching what I can't change.

With this being said. I really do appreciate you taking the time and making available alternative information so people have an alternative to the propaganda of the major news networks.

Still no talk of the clip sized used compared to the volleys of fire? I would like to hear some opinions on that.... how many rounds do the clips hold compared to how many rounds fired in one volley?? Love your work 🖖🏼🌏✌🏼

Why are there no burn marks from the hot brass casings on the carpet?? where are the 1000 rounds of brass cassings that are suppose to be on the floor?? why are the rifles on the floor laying on its ejection port side down??
WTF man??

According to Bill Still, and the video shot from the Uber driver in front of the Mandalay Bay hotel, one of the volley's heard was over 103 rounds, then an 84 round volley. Another volley of 72 rounds was recorded by someone else from a different location. I'm not familiar with clips or drums over 100 rounds that can be used for rifles, which leads to a belt fed machine gun. Everything is speculation though at this point, I definitely don't have all of the answers, or know for sure if we're listening to one gun or one shooter, it sure sounds like it though, at least in the ones before mentioned.

The Mags shown in the pics were definitely not 100 round magazines; maybe 30. The volleys were upwards of 80 to 100 at times

In one of the photos you can see an extended AR mag, those can be 60-100 rounds.

Kinda looks some elements of Sandy Hook to me.

Funny how they were able to so emphatically declare there was only one shooter so soon after the event ... before any proper investigation, or autopsies on the victims, could be conducted.

54 years on and they are still pushing this shit.

Thanks for shaing.i like your post and upvoted.

Nice sharing please upvote and follow me

Keep getting the truth out!

we all know they're lying... the sad thing is "so what?"

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.31
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 64341.19
ETH 3145.13
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.00