You either didn't read or did not understand the link I gave you, because for one thing they did not administer a vaccine in the control, and for another thing even if they did, actually understanding the outcome of the study still disproves the 1 in 912 claim.

That's cute that you're calling me a "pharma troll" and a "liar" and all that crap, when really I'm a chemist and you're just some dingus on the internet taking part in a hysteria over something you don't understand. The problem is with your lack of scientific understanding. Maybe try getting a degree in biochemistry and revisit this anti-vaxx shit. If you can't, then consider not spreading false claims over things you don't understand.

Also, there are plenty of studies on long-term effects of vaccines. All you need to do to find them is be scientifically literate enough to know what search terms to put into pubmed, google scholar, etc. and then be able to read them. But you can't do that, so you're ignoring them and instead getting biased information from dumb infographics you find on the internet, as if that's a real source.