You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: VACCINES: Taking A Closer Look At The Ingredients And Their Effects (WEEKLY SERIES)
I sure hope you don't drink any beverages from an aluminium can! It's going to rot your brain and if the aluminium didn't already get you the di-hydrogen-monoxide definitely will!
Typical troll comment^ Aluminum is much more harmful when injected. Duh! Though it's still toxic from cans. Why do think there are so many neurological problems today? 1 in 6 kids today have a developmental disability. There's something terribly wrong with the average person's health, so don't act like the author is just paranoid for no reason. The people you get your advice from have no idea why we're all so sick. Could it be the neurotoxins we're injecting into our babies and pregnant mothers without adequate testing? It's not so far fetched ya know.
LOL, great response! I usually just ignore trolls, but your reply was masterful. Thanks for that.
Actually I'm just testing you to see if he was reading comments. No point in wasting time arguing with someone who will hit and run.
And my point about aluminium in cans and di-hydrogen-monoxide are serious ones. There are toxic levels of exposure of everything - yes aluminium but also water. And I'm not tallking about drowning - people can and do die from drinking too much water. I'm sure you know that.
Which means it is vital to look at exposure levels and consider statistics - so you can't just cherry pick data that supports your case either.
Why is it that someone would cite and apparently believe hook line and sinker the output of Humphries and Mercola, and yet omit the conclusions of the FDA report linked to, instead just citing a paragraph about toxicity pathways of aluminum out of context?
For the record here is what the FDA link provided says:
However, it's your bodies, do what you want with it. From the sound of it most commenters here will find the homeopathic "remedies" peddled by Humphries and Mercola's far more agreeable. They are after all just pure but highly profitable di-hydrogen-monoxide placebos. Well lets hope they are actually pure and don't contain any aluminum or any of the toxins that the homeopaths say they contain "memories" of.
Finally:
Why does anyone feel the need to drop a completely speculative and unsubstantiated comment like this at the end of a post of they are expecting to be taken seriously? Is it just bait to attract conspiracy theory troll upvotes? When you dump a turd like that at the end of what might otherwise have been an honest attempt at pseudo research you are begging to be bucketed with the pizzagate and flat-earth crowd.
PS. The latest "study" on aluminum in vaccines Subcutaneous injections of aluminum at vaccine adjuvant levels activate innate immune genes in mouse brain that are homologous with biomarkers of autism that everyone who is a "believer" is jumping on is now due to be retracted due to serious issues questioning its validity. And guess who this article is by? Shaw and Tomljenovic (plus Li this time) who published one of the articles cited above by the OP.
This will be the second article on aluminum they have had to retract and that's a big deal. It's bad enough to cherry pick science, but to cherry pick bad science by those with a track record for bad science... tsk, tsk!
Source: http://retractionwatch.com/2017/10/09/journal-retract-paper-called-anti-vaccine-pseudoscience/