Thank you for including the link to the paper. It was a well-written manuscript but be careful in the interpretation. At no point could they say vaccines increased risk of autism, nor could they say based on their research that elevated CNS Aluminum causes autism. In addition, the article relies on cadaveric examination with no control group (ie. brain samples from non-autistic decreased patient, tested at same time and age-matched), and was a very small number of subjects. The best this article was able to do is generate a hypothesis that patients with autism have higher CNS concentration of aluminum vs age-matched controls (general population) which NOW needs to be tested in a much larger number of subjects. But even then, that still does not prove aluminum causes autism. We have not even gotten into all the possible sources of Aluminum that individuals can be exposed to in their lifetime (that gets into their system). It may be more telling if testing could be done on children with autism under age 10 vs age-matched controls (children under age 10 without autism). Thank you