Sort:  

too bad the claim you make cannot be backed up by actual substance

I mean they are. Again CDC/WHO website has all the info you need.

too bad the claim you make cannot be backed up by actual substance

I mean they are. Again CDC/WHO website has all the info you need.

Congrats on your 30th reply btw

You're repeating yourself, the burden of proof is on the claimant.

Well, actually my claims were all in response to OP, who has shown no proof of anything.

No they weren't you made the claim that everyone is uneducated and misinformed in the midst of the comments, you also claimed that the study had nothing to do with vaccines.

You make claims, you present the evidence, you have evaded that step by claiming that I don't know how to use google and that I am retarded and autistic, and affirming me a million time that it's all on the CDC website, but you won't present the information that is apparently available to everyone and claim that it exist because it's there. Clearly that is either gross misrepresentation of facts: we were talking about specific studies and you point to "GO TO THE LIBRARY", then assert that "it's at the library" ad nasuem, or a lie, you are lying that the thing is there because you refuse to be specific or straight, and in evading the responsibility of providing proof, you think that nobody will call you a liar.

You keep claiming "I'm not a liar" while that might be true, you have yet to demonstrate why and how the claim that vaccines have safety studies done, is true, when asked for said evidence you evaded providing it numerous times now. Can you provide us with an actual safety study done on vaccines or can you not?

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.14
JST 0.029
BTC 57382.38
ETH 3075.07
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.39