You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Vaxxed and Injured My family's Story
That answers the question of Why does it make sense to stereotype or pigenhole people and conversations. Makes sense, blunt, without substance, baseless claim, of some basis.
In the history anti-vaxxers, has nobody ever made a substantial claim.
So you say that the basis for committing the fallacy of stereotyping people and the conversations people have is because stereotypes and pigeonholing has some basis, and that is a substantial basis for committing a fallacy, otherwise why are you trying to imply that?